Create PlanSAFE
A curated list of practical Codex skills for automating workflows across the Codex CLI and API.
Overview
A curated list of practical Codex skills for automating workflows across the Codex CLI and API.
f10a5237c0bdOBSERVED · 2026-10-22What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: create-plan
description: Create a concise plan. Use when a user explicitly asks for a plan related to a coding task.
metadata:
short-description: Create a plan
---
# Create Plan
## Goal
Turn a user prompt into a **single, actionable plan** delivered in the final assistant message.
## Minimal workflow
Throughout the entire workflow, operate in read-only mode. Do not write or update files.
1. **Scan context quickly**
- Read `README.md` and any obvious docs (`docs/`, `CONTRIBUTING.md`, `ARCHITECTURE.md`).
- Skim relevant files (the ones most likely touched).
- Identify constraints (language, frameworks, CI/test commands, deployment shape).
2. **Ask follow-ups only if blocking**
- Ask **at most 1–2 questions**.
- Only ask if you cannot responsibly plan without the answer; prefer multiple-choice.
- If unsure but not blocked, make a reasonable assumption and proceed.
3. **Create a plan using the template below**
- Start with **1 short paragraph** describing the intent and approach.
- Clearly call out what is **in scope** and what is **not in scope** in short.
- Then provide a **small checklist** of action items (default 6–10 items).
- Each checklist item should be a concrete action and, when helpful, mention files/commands.
- **Make items atomic and ordered**: discovery → changes → tests → rollout.
- **Verb-first**: “Add...”, “Refactor...”, “Verify...”, “Ship...”.
- Include at least one item for **tests/validation** and one for **edge cases/risk** when applicable.
- If there are unknowns, include a tiny **Open questions** section (max 3).
4. **Do not preface the plan with meta explanations; output only the plan as per template**
## Plan template (follow exactly)
```markdown
# Plan
<1–3 sentences: what we’re doing, why, and the high-level approach.>
## Scope
- In:
- Out:
## Action items
[ ] <Step 1>
[ ] <Step 2>
[ ] <Step 3>
[ ] <Step 4>
[ ] <Step 5>
[ ] <Step 6>
## Open questions
- <Question 1>
- <Question 2>
- <Question 3>
```
## Checklist item guidance
Good checklist items:
- Point to likely files/modules: src/..., app/..., services/...
- Name concrete validation: “Run npm test”, “Add unit tests for X”
- Include safe rollout when relevant: feature flag, migration plan, rollback note
Avoid:
- Vague steps (“handle backend”, “do auth”)
- Too many micro-steps
- Writing code snippets (keep the plan implementation-agnostic)Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
f10a5237c0bdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/composiohq__create-plan.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-22 | f10a5237c0bd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the create-plan — composiohq/awesome-codex-skills skill do?
A curated list of practical Codex skills for automating workflows across the Codex CLI and API.
Is create-plan — composiohq/awesome-codex-skills safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can create-plan — composiohq/awesome-codex-skills access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (f10a5237c0bd), read on 2026-10-22. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.
Add this badge to your README
Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.
[](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/composiohq/create-plan/)
Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.