Risk Modeling GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: risk-modeling-guide
description: "Financial risk modeling including VaR, stress testing, and credit risk"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "📉"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "finance"
keywords: ["risk-modeling", "var", "stress-testing", "credit-risk", "monte-carlo", "basel"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Risk Modeling Guide
A skill for quantitative financial risk modeling, covering Value at Risk, Expected Shortfall, credit risk, stress testing, and Monte Carlo simulation methods. Essential for financial engineering research and regulatory risk analysis.
## Market Risk: Value at Risk
### VaR Methodologies
| Method | Description | Pros | Cons |
|--------|-------------|------|------|
| Historical simulation | Replay past returns | No distributional assumption | Assumes past repeats |
| Variance-covariance | Assume normal returns | Fast, analytical | Underestimates tail risk |
| Monte Carlo simulation | Simulate from fitted model | Flexible distributions | Computationally expensive |
| Filtered historical simulation | GARCH + historical innovations | Captures volatility clustering | More complex |
### Implementation
```python
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
from scipy.stats import norm, t as t_dist
def historical_var(returns: np.ndarray, confidence: float = 0.99,
horizon_days: int = 1) -> dict:
"""
Compute Value at Risk using historical simulation.
returns: array of daily log returns
confidence: confidence level (e.g., 0.99 for 99% VaR)
horizon_days: risk horizon in days
"""
# Scale returns to horizon
if horizon_days > 1:
# Rolling sum for overlapping returns
scaled_returns = pd.Series(returns).rolling(horizon_days).sum().dropna().values
else:
scaled_returns = returns
alpha = 1 - confidence
var = -np.percentile(scaled_returns, alpha * 100)
es = -np.mean(scaled_returns[scaled_returns <= -var])
return {
"VaR": round(var, 6),
"Expected_Shortfall": round(es, 6),
"confidence": confidence,
"horizon_days": horizon_days,
"n_observations": len(scaled_returns),
}
def parametric_var(returns: np.ndarray, confidence: float = 0.99,
distribution: str = "normal") -> dict:
"""
Parametric VaR assuming normal or Student-t distribution.
"""
mu = np.mean(returns)
sigma = np.std(returns, ddof=1)
if distribution == "normal":
z = norm.ppf(1 - confidence)
var = -(mu + sigma * z)
# Analytical ES for normal
es = -mu + sigma * norm.pdf(norm.ppf(1 - confidence)) / (1 - confidence)
elif distribution == "student-t":
# Fit Student-t
df, loc, scale = t_dist.fit(returns)
z = t_dist.ppf(1 - confidence, df)
var = -(loc + scale * z)
# ES for Student-t
t_pdf = t_dist.pdf(t_dist.ppf(1 - confidence, df), df)
es = -loc + scale * (t_pdf / (1 - confidence)) * ((df + z**2) / (df - 1))
else:
raise ValueError(f"Unknown distribution: {distribution}")
return {
"VaR": round(var, 6),
"Expected_Shortfall": round(es, 6),
"distribution": distribution,
"mean": round(mu, 6),
"std": round(sigma, 6),
}
```
### Monte Carlo VaR
```python
def monte_carlo_var(returns: np.ndarray, n_simulations: int = 100000,
confidence: float = 0.99,
horizon_days: int = 10) -> dict:
"""
Monte Carlo VaR using GBM (Geometric Brownian Motion).
"""
mu = np.mean(returns)
sigma = np.std(returns, ddof=1)
# Simulate daily returns for the horizon
rng = np.random.default_rng(42)
simulated = rng.normal(
mu * horizon_days,
sigma * np.sqrt(horizon_days),
size=n_simulations,
)
alpha = 1 - confidence
var = -np.percentile(simulated, alpha * 100)
es = -np.mean(simulated[simulated <= -var])
return {
"VaR": round(var, 6),
"Expected_Shortfall": round(es, 6),
"n_simulations": n_simulations,
"confidence": confidence,
"horizon_days": horizon_days,
}
```
## Credit Risk Modeling
### Probability of Default Estimation
```python
from sklearn.linear_model import LogisticRegression
def build_pd_model(features: pd.DataFrame,
default_flag: pd.Series) -> dict:
"""
Build a Probability of Default (PD) model using logistic regression.
Common features: debt-to-income, credit utilization, payment history,
employment length, loan amount.
"""
model = LogisticRegression(max_iter=1000, class_weight="balanced")
model.fit(features, default_flag)
# Coefficient interpretation
coef_df = pd.DataFrame({
"feature": features.columns,
"coefficient": model.coef_[0],
"odds_ratio": np.exp(model.coef_[0]),
}).sort_values("coefficient", ascending=False)
# Model discrimination
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score
pred_proba = model.predict_proba(features)[:, 1]
auc = roc_auc_score(default_flag, pred_proba)
return {
"auc": round(auc, 4),
"coefficients": coef_df.to_dict("records"),
"intercept": round(model.intercept_[0], 4),
}
```
### Loss Given Default and EAD
```python
def compute_expected_loss(pd_score: float, lgd: float,
ead: float) -> dict:
"""
Compute Expected Loss = PD x LGD x EAD.
pd_score: probability of default (0-1)
lgd: loss given default (0-1, fraction of exposure lost)
ead: exposure at default (dollar amount)
"""
el = pd_score * lgd * ead
return {
"PD": pd_score,
"LGD": lgd,
"EAD": ead,
"Expected_Loss": round(el, 2),
"Unexpected_Loss_99": round(el * 2.33 * np.sqrt(pd_score * (1 - pd_score)), 2),
}
```
## Stress Testing
### Scenario-Based Stress Tests
```python
def run_stress_test(portfolio_returns: pd.DataFrame,
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__risk-modeling-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Risk Modeling Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Risk Modeling Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Risk Modeling Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Risk Modeling Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.