Portfolio Optimization GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: portfolio-optimization-guide
description: "Portfolio theory, optimization algorithms, and asset allocation methods"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "💼"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "finance"
keywords: ["portfolio", "optimization", "markowitz", "asset-allocation", "mean-variance", "black-litterman"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Portfolio Optimization Guide
A skill for implementing and researching portfolio optimization methods, from classical mean-variance optimization to modern robust and factor-based approaches. Covers Markowitz theory, Black-Litterman, risk parity, and machine learning-enhanced portfolio construction.
## Mean-Variance Optimization
### Classical Markowitz Portfolio
```python
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import minimize
def mean_variance_optimize(expected_returns: np.ndarray,
cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
target_return: float = None,
risk_free_rate: float = 0.02) -> dict:
"""
Markowitz mean-variance optimization.
expected_returns: array of expected returns for each asset
cov_matrix: covariance matrix of asset returns
target_return: target portfolio return (None for max Sharpe)
"""
n_assets = len(expected_returns)
def portfolio_volatility(weights):
return np.sqrt(weights @ cov_matrix @ weights)
def neg_sharpe(weights):
ret = weights @ expected_returns
vol = portfolio_volatility(weights)
return -(ret - risk_free_rate) / vol
# Constraints
constraints = [
{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda w: np.sum(w) - 1}, # weights sum to 1
]
if target_return is not None:
constraints.append(
{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda w: w @ expected_returns - target_return}
)
# Bounds: no short selling (0 to 1 per asset)
bounds = [(0, 1) for _ in range(n_assets)]
# Initial guess: equal weight
w0 = np.ones(n_assets) / n_assets
if target_return is not None:
# Minimize volatility for given return
result = minimize(portfolio_volatility, w0,
bounds=bounds, constraints=constraints)
else:
# Maximize Sharpe ratio
result = minimize(neg_sharpe, w0,
bounds=bounds, constraints=constraints)
weights = result.x
ret = weights @ expected_returns
vol = portfolio_volatility(weights)
return {
"weights": {f"asset_{i}": round(w, 4) for i, w in enumerate(weights)},
"expected_return": round(ret, 4),
"volatility": round(vol, 4),
"sharpe_ratio": round((ret - risk_free_rate) / vol, 4),
}
```
### Efficient Frontier
```python
def compute_efficient_frontier(expected_returns: np.ndarray,
cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
n_points: int = 50) -> list[dict]:
"""
Compute the efficient frontier by solving for minimum variance
portfolios at each target return level.
"""
min_ret = expected_returns.min() * 0.8
max_ret = expected_returns.max() * 1.1
target_returns = np.linspace(min_ret, max_ret, n_points)
frontier = []
for target in target_returns:
try:
result = mean_variance_optimize(
expected_returns, cov_matrix, target_return=target
)
frontier.append({
"return": result["expected_return"],
"volatility": result["volatility"],
"sharpe": result["sharpe_ratio"],
})
except Exception:
continue
return frontier
```
## Black-Litterman Model
### Incorporating Investor Views
```python
def black_litterman(market_cap_weights: np.ndarray,
cov_matrix: np.ndarray,
P: np.ndarray,
Q: np.ndarray,
omega: np.ndarray = None,
risk_aversion: float = 2.5,
tau: float = 0.05) -> dict:
"""
Black-Litterman model for combining market equilibrium with
investor views.
market_cap_weights: market-cap weighted portfolio
cov_matrix: covariance matrix
P: pick matrix (k views x n assets), identifies assets in each view
Q: view returns (k x 1), expected returns for each view
omega: view uncertainty (k x k), diagonal matrix
"""
# Step 1: Implied equilibrium returns (reverse optimization)
pi = risk_aversion * cov_matrix @ market_cap_weights
# Step 2: View uncertainty (if not provided, use He-Litterman)
if omega is None:
omega = np.diag(np.diag(tau * P @ cov_matrix @ P.T))
# Step 3: Posterior expected returns
tau_sigma = tau * cov_matrix
inv_tau_sigma = np.linalg.inv(tau_sigma)
inv_omega = np.linalg.inv(omega)
posterior_precision = inv_tau_sigma + P.T @ inv_omega @ P
posterior_cov = np.linalg.inv(posterior_precision)
posterior_mean = posterior_cov @ (inv_tau_sigma @ pi + P.T @ inv_omega @ Q)
return {
"equilibrium_returns": pi.round(4).tolist(),
"posterior_returns": posterior_mean.round(4).tolist(),
"posterior_covariance": posterior_cov.round(6).tolist(),
}
```
## Risk Parity
### Equal Risk Contribution Portfolio
```python
def risk_parity(cov_matrix: np.ndarray, budget: np.ndarray = None) -> dict:
"""
Risk parity: each asset contributes equally to total portfolio risk.
budget: risk budget (default: equal, 1/n each)
"""
n = cov_matrix.shape[0]
if budget is None:
budget = np.ones(n) / n
def objective(weights):
portfolio_vol = np.sqrt(weights @ cov_matrix @ weights)
marginal_risk = cov_matrix @ weights
risk_contribution = weights * marginal_risk / portfolio_vol
target_risk = budget * portfolio_vol
return np.sum((risk_contribution - target_risk) ** 2)
constraints = [{"type": "eq", "fun": lambda w: np.sum(w) - 1}]
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__portfolio-optimization-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Portfolio Optimization Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Portfolio Optimization Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Portfolio Optimization Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Portfolio Optimization Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.