Atlas / Skills / brycewang-stanford / Experimental Design Guide

Experimental Design GuideSAFE

skills/brycewang-stanford/experimental-design-guide

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
1 documented
License
NOASSERTION
Stars
4,535
01

Overview

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Read from source at commit e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
openclawmentioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: experimental-design-guide
description: "Design rigorous experiments using DOE, factorial designs, and response surfaces"
metadata:
  openclaw:
    emoji: "🧪"
    category: "research"
    subcategory: "methodology"
    keywords: ["design of experiments", "DOE", "factorial design", "response surface methodology", "experimental design"]
    source: "wentor"
---

# Experimental Design Guide

A skill for designing rigorous experiments using formal Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology. Covers factorial designs, fractional factorials, response surface methods, and optimal design strategies for scientific research.

## Fundamental Principles

### Fisher's Three Principles

1. **Randomization**: Assign experimental units to treatments randomly to eliminate systematic bias
2. **Replication**: Include enough replicates to estimate experimental error and ensure statistical power
3. **Blocking**: Group similar experimental units to reduce nuisance variability

### Sample Size and Power Analysis

```python
from scipy import stats
import numpy as np

def power_analysis_ttest(effect_size: float, alpha: float = 0.05,
                          power: float = 0.80, ratio: float = 1.0) -> dict:
    """
    Calculate required sample size for a two-sample t-test.

    Args:
        effect_size: Cohen's d (expected effect size)
        alpha: Significance level
        power: Desired statistical power
        ratio: Ratio of n2/n1 (for unequal groups)
    """
    from statsmodels.stats.power import TTestIndPower
    analysis = TTestIndPower()
    n1 = analysis.solve_power(
        effect_size=effect_size,
        alpha=alpha,
        power=power,
        ratio=ratio,
        alternative='two-sided'
    )

    return {
        'n_per_group': int(np.ceil(n1)),
        'total_n': int(np.ceil(n1) + np.ceil(n1 * ratio)),
        'effect_size_d': effect_size,
        'alpha': alpha,
        'power': power,
        'interpretation': (
            f"Need {int(np.ceil(n1))} per group "
            f"(total N = {int(np.ceil(n1) + np.ceil(n1 * ratio))}) "
            f"to detect d = {effect_size} with {power*100:.0f}% power."
        )
    }

# Example: medium effect size
result = power_analysis_ttest(effect_size=0.5, alpha=0.05, power=0.80)
print(result['interpretation'])
```

## Full Factorial Designs

### 2^k Factorial Design

```python
import itertools
import pandas as pd

def create_factorial_design(factors: dict, replicates: int = 3) -> pd.DataFrame:
    """
    Create a full factorial experimental design.

    Args:
        factors: Dict mapping factor names to lists of levels
                 e.g., {'Temperature': [60, 80], 'Pressure': [1, 2], 'Catalyst': ['A', 'B']}
        replicates: Number of replicates per combination
    """
    factor_names = list(factors.keys())
    factor_levels = list(factors.values())

    # Generate all combinations
    combinations = list(itertools.product(*factor_levels))

    # Create design matrix with replicates
    rows = []
    run_order = 0
    for rep in range(replicates):
        for combo in combinations:
            run_order += 1
            row = {'Run': run_order, 'Replicate': rep + 1}
            for name, value in zip(factor_names, combo):
                row[name] = value
            row['Response'] = None  # To be filled with experimental data
            rows.append(row)

    design = pd.DataFrame(rows)

    # Randomize run order
    design = design.sample(frac=1, random_state=42).reset_index(drop=True)
    design['RandomizedRun'] = range(1, len(design) + 1)

    print(f"Design summary:")
    print(f"  Factors: {len(factors)}")
    print(f"  Levels per factor: {[len(v) for v in factors.values()]}")
    print(f"  Total treatments: {len(combinations)}")
    print(f"  Replicates: {replicates}")
    print(f"  Total runs: {len(design)}")

    return design

# Example: 2^3 factorial
design = create_factorial_design({
    'Temperature': [60, 80],
    'Pressure': [1, 2],
    'Catalyst': ['A', 'B']
}, replicates=3)
```

### Analyzing Factorial Experiments

```python
import statsmodels.api as sm
from statsmodels.formula.api import ols

def analyze_factorial(df: pd.DataFrame, response: str,
                       factors: list[str]) -> dict:
    """
    Analyze a factorial experiment using ANOVA.
    """
    # Build formula with all main effects and interactions
    main_effects = ' + '.join([f'C({f})' for f in factors])
    interactions = ' + '.join([f'C({f1}):C({f2})'
                               for i, f1 in enumerate(factors)
                               for f2 in factors[i+1:]])
    formula = f'{response} ~ {main_effects} + {interactions}'

    model = ols(formula, data=df).fit()
    anova_table = sm.stats.anova_lm(model, typ=2)

    # Effect sizes (eta-squared)
    ss_total = anova_table['sum_sq'].sum()
    anova_table['eta_sq'] = anova_table['sum_sq'] / ss_total

    return {
        'anova_table': anova_table,
        'r_squared': model.rsquared,
        'significant_effects': anova_table[anova_table['PR(>F)'] < 0.05].index.tolist()
    }
```

## Fractional Factorial Designs

When a full factorial has too many runs:

```python
def fractional_factorial_2k(k: int, resolution: int = 3) -> pd.DataFrame:
    """
    Generate a 2^(k-p) fractional factorial design.

    Args:
        k: Number of factors
        resolution: Design resolution (III, IV, or V)
    """
    from pyDOE2 import fracfact

    # Resolution III: 2^(k-p) where p minimizes runs
    # Common designs:
    # 2^(3-1) = 4 runs (Resolution III)
    # 2^(4-1) = 8 runs (Resolution IV)
    # 2^(5-2) = 8 runs (Resolution III)
    # 2^(7-4) = 8 runs (Resolution III, Plackett-Burman)

    design = fracfact(f'a b c {"d" if k >= 4 else ""} {"e" if k >= 5 else ""}')
    df = pd.DataFrame(design, columns=[f'Factor_{i+1}' for i in range(design.shape[1])])

    print(f"Fractional factorial: {len(df)} runs for {k} factors")
    return df
```

## Response Surface Methodology (RSM)

### Central Composite De
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-08 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__experimental-design-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-08e1ba289846fdSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Experimental Design Guide skill do?

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Is Experimental Design Guide safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Experimental Design Guide access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Experimental Design Guide work with?

Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement