Drug Target InteractionSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: drug-target-interaction
description: "Computational drug-target interaction prediction and virtual screening"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "💊"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "pharma"
keywords: ["drug-target", "virtual-screening", "molecular-docking", "binding-affinity", "cheminformatics"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Drug-Target Interaction Prediction
A skill for computational prediction of drug-target interactions (DTI), covering molecular docking, machine learning-based binding affinity prediction, compound library screening, and target identification using cheminformatics and structural biology tools.
## Drug-Target Interaction Databases
### Key Data Resources
| Database | Content | Access |
|----------|---------|--------|
| ChEMBL | 2.4M compounds, 15M bioactivities | REST API, SQL dump |
| BindingDB | 2.8M binding data points | Bulk download, REST API |
| DrugBank | 15,000+ drug entries with targets | Academic license |
| PDB (Protein Data Bank) | 220,000+ 3D structures | Free download, REST API |
| UniProt | 250M+ protein sequences | Free, REST API |
| STITCH | Chemical-protein interactions | Free academic access |
### Fetching Bioactivity Data
```python
from chembl_webresource_client.new_client import new_client
def get_target_bioactivities(target_chembl_id: str,
activity_type: str = "IC50",
max_nm: float = 10000) -> list[dict]:
"""
Retrieve bioactivity data for a protein target from ChEMBL.
Returns compounds with measured binding/inhibition values.
"""
activity = new_client.activity
results = activity.filter(
target_chembl_id=target_chembl_id,
standard_type=activity_type,
standard_relation="=",
standard_units="nM",
).only([
"molecule_chembl_id", "canonical_smiles",
"standard_value", "standard_type",
"pchembl_value", "assay_description",
])
filtered = []
for r in results:
if r.get("standard_value") and float(r["standard_value"]) <= max_nm:
filtered.append({
"molecule_id": r["molecule_chembl_id"],
"smiles": r["canonical_smiles"],
"activity_type": r["standard_type"],
"value_nM": float(r["standard_value"]),
"pchembl": float(r["pchembl_value"]) if r.get("pchembl_value") else None,
})
return filtered
```
## Molecular Fingerprints and Descriptors
### Computing Molecular Representations
```python
from rdkit import Chem
from rdkit.Chem import AllChem, Descriptors, rdMolDescriptors
import numpy as np
def compute_fingerprints(smiles_list: list[str],
fp_type: str = "morgan",
radius: int = 2,
n_bits: int = 2048) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Compute molecular fingerprints from SMILES strings.
fp_type: 'morgan' (ECFP-like), 'maccs', 'rdkit', 'topological'
"""
fps = []
for smi in smiles_list:
mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smi)
if mol is None:
fps.append(np.zeros(n_bits))
continue
if fp_type == "morgan":
fp = AllChem.GetMorganFingerprintAsBitVect(mol, radius, nBits=n_bits)
elif fp_type == "maccs":
fp = rdMolDescriptors.GetMACCSKeysFingerprint(mol)
elif fp_type == "rdkit":
fp = Chem.RDKFingerprint(mol, fpSize=n_bits)
else:
fp = AllChem.GetMorganFingerprintAsBitVect(mol, radius, nBits=n_bits)
arr = np.zeros(len(fp))
Chem.DataStructs.ConvertToNumpyArray(fp, arr)
fps.append(arr)
return np.array(fps)
def compute_descriptors(smiles: str) -> dict:
"""Compute physicochemical descriptors for a molecule."""
mol = Chem.MolFromSmiles(smiles)
if mol is None:
return {}
return {
"molecular_weight": Descriptors.MolWt(mol),
"logP": Descriptors.MolLogP(mol),
"hbd": Descriptors.NumHDonors(mol),
"hba": Descriptors.NumHAcceptors(mol),
"tpsa": Descriptors.TPSA(mol),
"rotatable_bonds": Descriptors.NumRotatableBonds(mol),
"aromatic_rings": Descriptors.NumAromaticRings(mol),
"lipinski_violations": sum([
Descriptors.MolWt(mol) > 500,
Descriptors.MolLogP(mol) > 5,
Descriptors.NumHDonors(mol) > 5,
Descriptors.NumHAcceptors(mol) > 10,
]),
}
```
## Machine Learning for DTI Prediction
### Binary Classification Model
```python
from sklearn.ensemble import RandomForestClassifier
from sklearn.model_selection import StratifiedKFold
from sklearn.metrics import roc_auc_score, average_precision_score
def train_dti_classifier(compound_fps: np.ndarray,
target_features: np.ndarray,
labels: np.ndarray) -> dict:
"""
Train a DTI classifier using compound-target pair features.
compound_fps: molecular fingerprints (n_samples, fp_dim)
target_features: protein descriptors (n_samples, target_dim)
labels: binary interaction labels (1=interacts, 0=no interaction)
"""
# Concatenate compound and target features
X = np.hstack([compound_fps, target_features])
y = labels
skf = StratifiedKFold(n_splits=5, shuffle=True, random_state=42)
metrics = {"auroc": [], "auprc": []}
for train_idx, test_idx in skf.split(X, y):
model = RandomForestClassifier(
n_estimators=500, max_depth=20, n_jobs=-1, random_state=42
)
model.fit(X[train_idx], y[train_idx])
pred_proba = model.predict_proba(X[test_idx])[:, 1]
metrics["auroc"].append(roc_auc_score(y[test_idx], pred_proba))
metrics["auprc"].append(average_precision_score(y[test_idx], pred_proba))
return {
"mean_auroc": np.mean(metrics["auroc"]),
"mean_auprc": np.mean(metrics["auprc"]),
"model": model,
}
```
### Deep Learning Approaches
Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__drug-target-interaction.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Drug Target Interaction skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Drug Target Interaction safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Drug Target Interaction access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Drug Target Interaction work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.