Drug Development GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: drug-development-guide
description: "End-to-end drug development pipeline from target identification to regulatory..."
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "💊"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "pharma"
keywords: ["drug development", "pharmacokinetics", "clinical trial", "drug discovery", "lead optimization"]
source: "wentor"
---
# Drug Development Guide
A comprehensive skill covering the drug development pipeline from target identification through regulatory approval. Designed for pharmaceutical researchers, medicinal chemists, and clinical scientists conducting academic or industry research.
## Drug Discovery Pipeline Overview
```
Target ID -> Hit Finding -> Lead Optimization -> Preclinical -> Phase I -> Phase II -> Phase III -> Regulatory Filing
(1-2 yr) (1-2 yr) (1-3 yr) (1-2 yr) (1 yr) (2 yr) (3 yr) (1-2 yr)
Total timeline: ~10-15 years | Success rate: ~5-10% from Phase I to approval
Estimated cost: $1.3B-$2.8B per approved drug (DiMasi et al., 2016)
```
## Target Identification and Validation
### Computational Target Discovery
```python
import pandas as pd
from scipy import stats
def differential_expression_analysis(expression_data: pd.DataFrame,
disease_group: list[str],
control_group: list[str],
fdr_threshold: float = 0.05) -> pd.DataFrame:
"""
Identify differentially expressed genes as potential drug targets.
Args:
expression_data: Gene x Sample expression matrix
disease_group: Sample IDs in disease condition
control_group: Sample IDs in control condition
fdr_threshold: False discovery rate threshold
"""
results = []
for gene in expression_data.index:
disease_vals = expression_data.loc[gene, disease_group]
control_vals = expression_data.loc[gene, control_group]
t_stat, p_value = stats.ttest_ind(disease_vals, control_vals)
fold_change = disease_vals.mean() / (control_vals.mean() + 1e-10)
results.append({
'gene': gene,
'fold_change': fold_change,
'log2_fc': np.log2(abs(fold_change) + 1e-10),
'p_value': p_value,
't_statistic': t_stat
})
df = pd.DataFrame(results)
# Benjamini-Hochberg FDR correction
from statsmodels.stats.multitest import multipletests
df['fdr'] = multipletests(df['p_value'], method='fdr_bh')[1]
df['significant'] = df['fdr'] < fdr_threshold
return df.sort_values('fdr')
```
### Target Validation Criteria
A robust drug target should satisfy multiple criteria:
| Criterion | Method | Evidence Strength |
|-----------|--------|------------------|
| Genetic association | GWAS, Mendelian randomization | Strong |
| Expression in disease tissue | RNA-seq, immunohistochemistry | Moderate |
| Functional role | CRISPR knockout, siRNA | Strong |
| Druggability | Structural analysis, binding pockets | Essential |
| Safety (anti-target) | Phenotype of loss-of-function mutations | Essential |
## Lead Optimization
### ADMET Property Prediction
Assess absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion, and toxicity early:
```python
def lipinski_rule_of_five(molecular_weight: float, logp: float,
hbd: int, hba: int) -> dict:
"""
Evaluate Lipinski's Rule of Five for oral bioavailability.
Args:
molecular_weight: Molecular weight in Da
logp: Calculated LogP (lipophilicity)
hbd: Number of hydrogen bond donors
hba: Number of hydrogen bond acceptors
"""
violations = 0
details = []
if molecular_weight > 500:
violations += 1
details.append(f"MW {molecular_weight} > 500")
if logp > 5:
violations += 1
details.append(f"LogP {logp} > 5")
if hbd > 5:
violations += 1
details.append(f"HBD {hbd} > 5")
if hba > 10:
violations += 1
details.append(f"HBA {hba} > 10")
return {
'violations': violations,
'passes': violations <= 1,
'details': details,
'assessment': 'Likely orally bioavailable' if violations <= 1
else 'Poor oral bioavailability expected'
}
```
## Pharmacokinetics Modeling
### Compartmental PK Analysis
```python
import numpy as np
from scipy.optimize import curve_fit
def one_compartment_iv(t, dose, V, CL):
"""One-compartment IV bolus model."""
k_el = CL / V
return (dose / V) * np.exp(-k_el * t)
def compute_pk_parameters(time_points: np.ndarray,
concentrations: np.ndarray,
dose: float) -> dict:
"""
Fit one-compartment model and derive PK parameters.
"""
popt, pcov = curve_fit(
lambda t, V, CL: one_compartment_iv(t, dose, V, CL),
time_points, concentrations,
p0=[10, 1], bounds=(0, [1000, 100])
)
V, CL = popt
t_half = 0.693 * V / CL
auc = dose / CL
return {
'volume_of_distribution_L': round(V, 2),
'clearance_L_hr': round(CL, 2),
'half_life_hr': round(t_half, 2),
'AUC_mg_hr_L': round(auc, 2)
}
```
## Clinical Trial Design
### Phase Selection and Endpoints
| Phase | Primary Goal | Typical N | Key Endpoints |
|-------|-------------|-----------|---------------|
| Phase I | Safety, dose finding | 20-80 | MTD, DLT, PK |
| Phase II | Efficacy signal | 100-300 | ORR, PFS, biomarkers |
| Phase III | Confirmatory efficacy | 300-3000 | OS, PFS, PROs |
| Phase IV | Post-marketing surveillance | 1000+ | ADRs, real-world effectiveness |
Always pre-register clinical trials on ClinicalTrials.gov and follow CONSORT guidelines for reporting. Use adaptive trial designs (e.g., Bayesian adaptive randomization, seamless Phase II/III) when appropriate to improve efficiency.
## References
- DiMasi, J. A., Grabowski, H. G., & Hansen, R. W. (2016). InnovatioTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__drug-development-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Drug Development Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Drug Development Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Drug Development Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Drug Development Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.