Atlas / Skills / brycewang-stanford / Clinical Research Guide

Clinical Research GuideSAFE

skills/brycewang-stanford/clinical-research-guide

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
1 documented
License
NOASSERTION
Stars
4,535
01

Overview

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Read from source at commit e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08
02

Host compatibility

What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.

HostStatusNotes
openclawmentioned
03

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: clinical-research-guide
description: "Design clinical studies and report using CONSORT, STROBE guidelines"
metadata:
  openclaw:
    emoji: "🏥"
    category: "domains"
    subcategory: "biomedical"
    keywords: ["clinical research", "CONSORT", "STROBE", "clinical trial", "study design", "reporting guidelines"]
    source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---

# Clinical Research Guide

A skill for designing clinical studies and reporting results according to established guidelines. Covers randomized controlled trials (CONSORT), observational studies (STROBE), diagnostic studies (STARD), and systematic reviews (PRISMA).

## Study Design Selection

### Hierarchy of Evidence

```
Systematic Reviews / Meta-analyses
       |
Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs)
       |
Cohort Studies (prospective)
       |
Case-Control Studies
       |
Cross-Sectional Studies
       |
Case Reports / Case Series
       |
Expert Opinion

Choose the design that best answers your research question
given ethical, practical, and resource constraints.
```

### Design Decision Framework

```python
def select_study_design(research_question: str,
                        can_randomize: bool,
                        outcome_prevalence: str,
                        time_constraint: str) -> dict:
    """
    Guide selection of clinical study design.

    Args:
        research_question: The clinical question
        can_randomize: Whether randomization is ethical and feasible
        outcome_prevalence: 'common' or 'rare'
        time_constraint: 'short', 'medium', or 'long'
    """
    if can_randomize:
        design = {
            "recommended": "Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT)",
            "reporting": "CONSORT 2010",
            "strengths": "Strongest causal inference",
            "considerations": [
                "Need equipoise (genuine uncertainty about which is better)",
                "Blinding may or may not be feasible",
                "Intent-to-treat analysis is the primary approach",
                "Pre-register at ClinicalTrials.gov or ISRCTN"
            ]
        }
    elif outcome_prevalence == "rare":
        design = {
            "recommended": "Case-Control Study",
            "reporting": "STROBE",
            "strengths": "Efficient for rare outcomes",
            "considerations": [
                "Select controls carefully (matching, population-based)",
                "Recall bias is a major threat",
                "Can only calculate odds ratios, not incidence"
            ]
        }
    elif time_constraint == "short":
        design = {
            "recommended": "Cross-Sectional Study",
            "reporting": "STROBE (cross-sectional extension)",
            "strengths": "Quick, inexpensive, good for prevalence",
            "considerations": [
                "Cannot establish temporal sequence",
                "Prevalence bias (overrepresents chronic conditions)",
                "Useful for hypothesis generation"
            ]
        }
    else:
        design = {
            "recommended": "Prospective Cohort Study",
            "reporting": "STROBE",
            "strengths": "Can establish temporal sequence, multiple outcomes",
            "considerations": [
                "Loss to follow-up is the main threat",
                "Confounding must be addressed analytically",
                "Expensive and time-consuming"
            ]
        }

    return design
```

## CONSORT for Randomized Trials

### Essential CONSORT Checklist Items

```
Title and Abstract:
  - Identify as randomized trial in the title
  - Structured abstract with trial design, methods, results, conclusions

Methods:
  - Trial design (parallel, crossover, factorial, etc.)
  - Participants: Eligibility criteria, settings, locations
  - Interventions: Precise details of interventions for each group
  - Outcomes: Primary and secondary, how and when assessed
  - Sample size: Calculation with assumptions stated
  - Randomization: Sequence generation, allocation concealment
  - Blinding: Who was blinded, how blinding was maintained

Results:
  - CONSORT flow diagram (enrollment, allocation, follow-up, analysis)
  - Baseline demographic table (Table 1)
  - Primary outcome with effect size and confidence interval
  - Harms and adverse events

Discussion:
  - Limitations including sources of potential bias
  - Generalizability
  - Interpretation consistent with results
```

### CONSORT Flow Diagram

```
                    Assessed for eligibility (n=...)
                              |
                    Excluded (n=...)
                    - Not meeting criteria (n=...)
                    - Declined to participate (n=...)
                    - Other reasons (n=...)
                              |
                    Randomized (n=...)
                    /                    \
            Allocated to               Allocated to
            intervention (n=...)       control (n=...)
                    |                        |
            Lost to follow-up          Lost to follow-up
            (n=..., reasons)           (n=..., reasons)
                    |                        |
            Analyzed (n=...)           Analyzed (n=...)
            Excluded from analysis     Excluded from analysis
            (n=..., reasons)           (n=..., reasons)
```

## STROBE for Observational Studies

### Key STROBE Requirements

```
Study design specific items:

Cohort:
  - Report follow-up time (person-years, median)
  - Report loss to follow-up with reasons
  - Use hazard ratios or incidence rate ratios

Case-Control:
  - Describe case definition and case ascertainment
  - Describe control selection (source, matching criteria)
  - Report odds ratios with confidence intervals

Cross-Sectional:
  - Report response rate and non-response analysis
  - Describe how the sample represents the target population
  - Report prevalence with confidence intervals
```

## Sample Size and Power

### Power Calculati
04

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codeNA
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-08 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__clinical-research-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
05

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-08e1ba289846fdSAFEB89first audit
06

Questions

What does the Clinical Research Guide skill do?

🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.

Is Clinical Research Guide safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can Clinical Research Guide access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

Which assistants does Clinical Research Guide work with?

Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement