Algorithms Complexity GuideSAFE
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Overview
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
e1ba289846fdOBSERVED · 2026-10-08Host compatibility
What the documentation claims. We have not run a compatibility test.
| Host | Status | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| openclaw | mentioned |
What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: algorithms-complexity-guide
description: "Analyze algorithm complexity and computational efficiency for research"
metadata:
openclaw:
emoji: "⚙️"
category: "domains"
subcategory: "cs"
keywords: ["algorithms", "computational complexity", "Big-O", "NP-hard", "optimization", "data structures"]
source: "wentor-research-plugins"
---
# Algorithms and Complexity Guide
A skill for analyzing algorithm complexity and computational efficiency in research contexts. Covers asymptotic notation, common complexity classes, NP-completeness, amortized analysis, and strategies for presenting algorithmic contributions in papers.
## Asymptotic Notation
### Big-O, Omega, and Theta
```
O(f(n)) -- Upper bound (worst case, "at most")
T(n) is O(f(n)) if T(n) <= c * f(n) for large n
Omega(f(n)) -- Lower bound (best case, "at least")
T(n) is Omega(f(n)) if T(n) >= c * f(n) for large n
Theta(f(n)) -- Tight bound (exact asymptotic growth)
Both O(f(n)) and Omega(f(n))
Common growth rates (slowest to fastest):
O(1) < O(log n) < O(sqrt(n)) < O(n) < O(n log n) < O(n^2) < O(n^3) < O(2^n) < O(n!)
```
### Practical Interpretation
```python
def estimate_runtime(n: int, complexity: str) -> dict:
"""
Estimate practical runtime for common complexities.
Args:
n: Input size
complexity: Complexity class string
"""
import math
complexities = {
"O(1)": 1,
"O(log n)": math.log2(max(n, 1)),
"O(n)": n,
"O(n log n)": n * math.log2(max(n, 1)),
"O(n^2)": n ** 2,
"O(n^3)": n ** 3,
"O(2^n)": 2 ** min(n, 40), # Cap to avoid overflow
}
operations = complexities.get(complexity, n)
# Assuming ~10^9 operations per second
seconds = operations / 1e9
return {
"input_size": n,
"complexity": complexity,
"estimated_operations": operations,
"estimated_time": (
f"{seconds:.2e} seconds"
if seconds < 60
else f"{seconds / 60:.1f} minutes"
if seconds < 3600
else f"{seconds / 3600:.1f} hours"
),
"feasible": operations < 1e12 # Roughly 1000 seconds
}
```
## Complexity Classes
### P, NP, and Beyond
```
P: Problems solvable in polynomial time
Examples: Sorting, shortest path, MST, linear programming
NP: Problems verifiable in polynomial time
(Given a solution, can check it quickly)
Examples: SAT, TSP, graph coloring, subset sum
NP-Complete: The "hardest" problems in NP
If any one is in P, then P = NP
Proven via reduction from a known NP-complete problem
NP-Hard: At least as hard as NP-complete
Not necessarily in NP (may not even be decision problems)
Examples: Optimization versions of NP-complete problems
PSPACE: Solvable with polynomial space (possibly exponential time)
Examples: QBF, certain game-theoretic problems
```
### Proving NP-Completeness
```
To prove problem X is NP-complete:
1. Show X is in NP:
- Given a certificate (proposed solution), verify it in poly time
2. Reduce a known NP-complete problem Y to X:
- Construct a polynomial-time transformation f
such that Y has solution iff f(Y) has solution in X
- Common starting problems: SAT, 3-SAT, Vertex Cover,
Hamiltonian Path, Subset Sum
```
## Algorithm Analysis Techniques
### Recurrence Relations
```
For divide-and-conquer algorithms, solve recurrences:
Master Theorem: T(n) = a * T(n/b) + O(n^d)
Case 1: d < log_b(a) -> T(n) = O(n^(log_b(a)))
Case 2: d = log_b(a) -> T(n) = O(n^d * log n)
Case 3: d > log_b(a) -> T(n) = O(n^d)
Examples:
Merge Sort: T(n) = 2T(n/2) + O(n) -> O(n log n) [Case 2]
Binary Search: T(n) = T(n/2) + O(1) -> O(log n) [Case 2]
Strassen: T(n) = 7T(n/2) + O(n^2) -> O(n^2.81) [Case 1]
```
### Amortized Analysis
```
Amortized analysis provides the average cost per operation over
a worst-case sequence of operations.
Methods:
- Aggregate method: Total cost / number of operations
- Accounting method: Assign "credits" to cheap operations
- Potential method: Define a potential function
Example: Dynamic array (ArrayList)
Most insertions: O(1)
Occasional resize: O(n)
Amortized cost per insertion: O(1)
(The expensive resizes are rare enough that the average stays constant)
```
## Presenting Algorithms in Papers
### Algorithm Pseudocode Standards
```latex
% Use the algorithm2e or algorithmicx package in LaTeX
\begin{algorithm}[H]
\caption{Description of Algorithm}
\label{alg:myalgorithm}
\KwIn{Input description}
\KwOut{Output description}
initialization\;
\While{condition}{
compute something\;
\If{condition}{
action\;
}
}
\Return result\;
\end{algorithm}
```
### What to Include in an Algorithms Paper
```
1. Problem definition (formal, with input/output specification)
2. Related work and existing approaches with their complexities
3. Algorithm description (pseudocode + English explanation)
4. Correctness proof (invariants, termination argument)
5. Complexity analysis (time and space, worst/average/amortized)
6. Experimental evaluation:
- Comparison with baselines on standard benchmarks
- Runtime scaling with input size (empirical vs. theoretical)
- Real-world datasets in addition to synthetic ones
7. Discussion of practical considerations (constants, cache behavior)
```
## Dealing with Intractability
When you encounter NP-hard problems in your research, consider: polynomial-time approximation algorithms (with provable approximation ratios), heuristics (greedy, local search, simulated annealing), fixed-parameter tractable (FPT) algorithms if a relevant parameter is small, integer linear programming (ILP) solvers for moderate-size instances, or restricting to special cases where the problem becomes tractable (e.g., trees, planar graphs).Trust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
e1ba289846fdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/brycewang-stanford__algorithms-complexity-guide.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-08 | e1ba289846fd | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Algorithms Complexity Guide skill do?
🔬 A curated collection of 23,000+ agent skills for empirical research across 8 social science disciplines. | 精选 23,000+ AI Agent 技能库,覆盖8大社会科学学科的实证研究。CoPaper.AI 20分钟完成一篇可复现的规范实证论文,并支持用户上传 Skills。-- Maintained by CoPaper.AI from Stanford REAP.
Is Algorithms Complexity Guide safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Algorithms Complexity Guide access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
Which assistants does Algorithms Complexity Guide work with?
Its documentation mentions openclaw. That is what the text claims, not a compatibility test we ran.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (e1ba289846fd), read on 2026-10-08. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.