Atlas / Skills / browserbase / Competitor Analysis

Competitor AnalysisSAFE

skills/browserbase/competitor-analysis

Browserbase's official collection of agent skills to access the web.

Verdict
SAFE
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
0.2.0
Hosts
—
License
—
Stars
3,745
01

Overview

Browserbase's official collection of agent skills to access the web.

Read from source at commit 45d21dc75974OBSERVED · 2026-10-27
Advertisement
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: competitor-analysis
description: |
  Competitor research and intelligence skill. Takes a user's company (with optional
  seed competitor URLs), auto-discovers additional competitors via Browserbase Search API,
  deeply researches each using a 4-lane pattern (marketing surface, external signal,
  public benchmarks, strategic diff vs the user's company), and compiles the results
  into an HTML report with four views: overview, per-competitor deep dive, side-by-side
  feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed (news, reviews,
  social, comparison pages, and public benchmarks).
  Use when the user wants to: (1) analyze competitors, (2) build a competitive matrix,
  (3) extract competitor pricing / features, (4) find comparison pages and online
  mentions of competitors, (5) surface public benchmarks. Triggers: "competitor analysis",
  "analyze competitors", "competitive intel", "competitor research", "competitor pricing",
  "feature comparison", "price comparison", "find comparisons", "who's comparing us",
  "competitor mentions", "competitor benchmarks".
license: MIT
compatibility: Requires the browse CLI (npm install -g browse) and BROWSERBASE_API_KEY env var
allowed-tools: Bash Agent AskUserQuestion
metadata:
  author: browserbase
  version: "0.2.0"
---

# Competitor Analysis

Analyze a user's competitors. Uses Browserbase Search API for discovery and a 4-lane Plan→Research→Synthesize pattern for enrichment — outputting an HTML report with overview, per-competitor deep dives, a side-by-side feature/pricing matrix, and a chronological mentions feed.

**Required**: `BROWSERBASE_API_KEY` env var and the `browse` CLI installed (`npm install -g browse`).

**First-run setup**: On the first run you'll be prompted to approve `browse cloud fetch`, `browse cloud search`, `cat`, `mkdir`, `sed`, etc. Select **"Yes, and don't ask again for: browse cloud fetch:\*"** (or equivalent) for each. To permanently approve, add these to your `~/.claude/settings.json` under `permissions.allow`:
```json
"Bash(browse:*)", "Bash(bunx:*)", "Bash(bun:*)", "Bash(node:*)",
"Bash(cat:*)", "Bash(mkdir:*)", "Bash(sed:*)", "Bash(head:*)", "Bash(tr:*)", "Bash(rm:*)"
```

**Path rules**: Always use full literal paths in Bash — NOT `~` or `$HOME`. Resolve the home directory once and use it everywhere. When building subagent prompts, replace `{SKILL_DIR}` with the full literal path.

**Output directory**: All output goes to `~/Desktop/{company_slug}_competitors_{YYYY-MM-DD}/`. This directory contains one `.md` file per competitor plus the generated HTML views and CSV.

**CRITICAL — Tool restrictions (applies to main agent AND all subagents)**:
- All web searches: use `browse cloud search`. NEVER WebSearch.
- All page fetches: use `browse cloud fetch --allow-redirects` (returns markdown by default; add `--format raw` if you need the original HTML, then pipe through `sed ... | tr -s ' \n'` to extract text). NEVER WebFetch. 1 MB response limit — fall back to `browse get markdown` (after `browse open <url> --remote`) for JS-heavy pages.
- All research output: subagents write **one markdown file per competitor** to `{OUTPUT_DIR}/{competitor-slug}.md` using bash heredoc. NEVER use the Write tool or `python3 -c`. See `references/example-research.md` for the file format.
- Report compilation: use `node {SKILL_DIR}/scripts/compile_report.mjs {OUTPUT_DIR} --user-company "{user_company}" --open` — generates `index.html`, `competitors/*.html`, `matrix.html`, `mentions.html`, `results.csv` in one step and opens overview.
- URL deduplication: `node {SKILL_DIR}/scripts/list_urls.mjs /tmp --prefix competitor`.
- **Subagents must use ONLY the Bash tool.**
- **Main agent NEVER reads raw discovery JSON batch files.**

**CRITICAL — Minimize permission prompts**:
- Subagents MUST batch ALL file writes into a SINGLE Bash call using chained heredocs.
- Batch ALL searches and ALL fetches into single Bash calls via `&&` chaining.

## Pipeline Overview

Follow these 8 steps in order. Do not skip or reorder.

1. **User Company Research** — Deeply understand the user's company, produce `precise_category` + `category_include_keywords` + `exclusion_list`
2. **Depth Mode + Seed Input** — Choose depth, accept optional seed competitor URLs
3. **Discovery (3 parallel waves)** — Wave A (alternatives), Wave B (precise category), Wave C (comparison-page graph via "X vs Y" title parsing)
4. **Gate** — `scripts/gate_candidates.mjs` fetches each candidate's hero text (via `browse cloud fetch`) and drops wrong-category URLs
5. **Confirm enrichment set with the user** — Present PASS / UNKNOWN / rejected-brand-matches via `AskUserQuestion`. User ticks the real ones, adds any the discovery missed. Skipping this step is wasteful because enrichment is expensive (25 subagents × depth budget) and the gate is imperfect (JS-heavy homepages, Cloudflare challenges, semantic-variant taglines)
6. **Deep Enrichment (5 subagents per competitor in deep/deeper modes)** — Marketing, Discussion, Social, News, Technical — each lane a separate subagent writing to `partials/`; then `merge_partials.mjs` consolidates. In deep/deeper modes, **Step 5d** adds a 6th Battle Card synthesis lane AFTER Step 5c fact-check completes — produces per-competitor Landmines / Objection Handlers / Talk Tracks grounded in cited evidence.
7. **Screenshots** — `capture_screenshots.mjs` via the `browse` CLI captures a 1280×800 homepage hero per competitor
8. **HTML Report** — Overview + per-competitor (with embedded hero screenshot + Battle Card card) + matrix + mentions views

---

## Step 0: Setup Output Directory

```bash
OUTPUT_DIR=~/Desktop/{company_slug}_competitors_{YYYY-MM-DD}
mkdir -p "$OUTPUT_DIR"
```

Replace `{company_slug}` with the user's company name (lowercase, hyphenated) and `{YYYY-MM-DD}` with today's date. Pass `{OUTPUT_DIR}` as a full literal path to every subagent.

Clean up discovery batch files from prior runs:
```bash
rm -f /tmp/competitor_discovery_batch_*.json
03

Trust audit

SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryPASS
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
declared (1 observation(s))
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (0)

No findings outside the package's declared scope.

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-27 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha 45d21dc75974full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/browserbase__competitor-analysis.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-2745d21dc75974SAFEB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the competitor-analysis — browserbase/skills skill do?

Browserbase's official collection of agent skills to access the web.

Is competitor-analysis — browserbase/skills safe to install?

The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.

What can competitor-analysis — browserbase/skills access on my machine?

The audit observed that it runs shell commands. Each of those is consistent with what it says it does. Secrets in the source: none found.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (45d21dc75974), read on 2026-10-27. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Add this badge to your README

Shows this page's audit result and links back to it. It updates when the audit does.

ModelsAtlas audit badge

Markdown
[![ModelsAtlas audit: Competitor Analysis](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/browserbase/competitor-analysis/badge.svg)](https://modelsatlas.com/skills/browserbase/competitor-analysis/)

Not your listing, or something out of date? Claim or update your listing.

Advertisement