Atlas / Skills / alirezarezvani / Fda Qsr Audit Prep

Fda Qsr Audit PrepCAUTION

skills/alirezarezvani/fda-qsr-audit-prep

380 Claude Code skills & agent skills & plugins (30+ Agents, 70+ custom commands, 380+ skills, customizable references, scripts)for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and 8 more coding agents — engineering, marketing, product, compliance, C-level advisory, research, business operations, commerc

Verdict
CAUTION
Grade
B
Trust score
89 /100
Version
—
Hosts
—
License
MIT
Stars
27,777
01

Overview

380 Claude Code skills & agent skills & plugins (30+ Agents, 70+ custom commands, 380+ skills, customizable references, scripts)for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and 8 more coding agents — engineering, marketing, product, compliance, C-level advisory, research, business operations, commerc

Read from source at commit b228be08e8bdOBSERVED · 2026-10-06
02

What it tells the agent

The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.

---
name: "fda-qsr-audit-prep"
description: "/cs:fda-qsr-audit-prep <scope> — FDA 21 CFR 820 (QSR / QMSR) audit 6-question forcing interrogation. Post-Feb 2026 substantially harmonized with ISO 13485. Use before annual internal QSR audit, pre-FDA-inspection readiness, or Form 483 response."
---

# /cs:fda-qsr-audit-prep — FDA QSR Forcing Questions

**Command:** `/cs:fda-qsr-audit-prep <scope>`

The FDA QSR auditor pressure-tests any US medical-device QSR work. Six questions before any internal audit, FDA inspection, Form 483 response, or recall decision.

## When to Run

- Before annual internal QSR audit
- Before pre-FDA-inspection readiness review (any device commercially distributed in US)
- After receiving Form 483 observations
- After Warning Letter receipt
- After MDR-reportable event
- Before recall decision (voluntary vs FDA-initiated)
- Before submitting 510(k) / PMA (where QSR posture affects approval timeline)

## The Six QSR Questions

### 1. Show me the complaint files from the last quarter — and the corresponding MDR reports.
**21 CFR 820.198 + 21 CFR 803 — most-cited FDA inspection area.**
- Complaint log complete: who / what / when / device / batch
- Investigation closure within reasonable timeline
- MDR-reporting decision tree applied: death OR serious injury OR malfunction-that-could-cause = MDR
- 30-day timeline for most MDR reports; 5 days for certain serious events
- Complaint trending input to management review

### 2. When was process validation (IQ/OQ/PQ) last revalidated per 21 CFR 820.75?
**Cross-walks ISO 13485 Clause 7.5.6 (substantially harmonized post-Feb 2026).**
- Initial validation at process introduction
- Revalidation triggers: process / equipment / material change OR periodic schedule
- Statistical techniques per 21 CFR 820.250 where applicable
- Cross-check with cs-cqm-iso13485 for ISO 13485 alignment

### 3. Show me the DHRs for products commercially distributed in last 2 years.
**21 CFR 820.180 — 2-year retention from commercial distribution; check sampling for completeness.**
- Device History Record (DHR) for each unit/lot/batch
- Must include: dates of manufacture, quantity manufactured, quantity released, acceptance records, primary identification label, device identification, control number
- Sample stratified by product class
- Verify DHR closeness to DHF (design history file)

### 4. Show me CAPAs from the last 6 months with effectiveness verification.
**21 CFR 820.100 = ISO 13485 8.5.2 substantially harmonized.**
- Root cause analysis depth (5 Why minimum)
- Effectiveness verification = measurable evidence, not "we updated the procedure"
- Containment / correction / corrective action distinction documented
- Closure approval by appropriate authority
- Aging CAPAs > 90 days flagged

### 5. Show me labeling (21 CFR 801) review for the most recent product launch.
**FDA-specific overlay not in ISO 13485.**
- Labeling per 21 CFR 801 requirements
- For specific device types: also 21 CFR 800 series sectoral overlays
- UDI (Unique Device Identification) per 21 CFR 830
- Promotional materials reviewed for accuracy + non-misleading

### 6. If a Form 483 was issued in the last 3 years, show me the closure status.
**Form 483 = FDA observation; not equivalent to ISO nonconformity.**
- Response within 15 working days
- Each observation has documented corrective + preventive action with timeline
- Effectiveness verification evidence
- For Warning Letters: separate response track + potentially FDA meeting

## Workflow

```bash
# 1. QSR compliance posture
python ra-qm-team/skills/fda-consultant-specialist/scripts/qsr_compliance_checker.py compliance_state.json

# 2. FDA submission tracking (510(k) / PMA / IDE)
python ra-qm-team/skills/fda-consultant-specialist/scripts/fda_submission_tracker.py submissions.json

# 3. HIPAA overlap (if connected device handles PHI)
python ra-qm-team/skills/fda-consultant-specialist/scripts/hipaa_risk_assessment.py phi_inventory.json

# 4. Mock FDA inspection
python ../../skills/compliance-os/scripts/audit_simulator.py fda_qsr_scope.json
```

## Output Format

```markdown
# FDA QSR Audit Prep: <scope>
**Date:** YYYY-MM-DD

## The Decision Being Made
[programme-plan | inspection-readiness | 483-response | MDR-decision | recall]

## Complaint + MDR Posture
- Complaints last quarter: N
- MDR-reportable events: M
- MDR reports filed within timeline: % (target 100%)
- Complaint trending review at management level: yes/no

## Process Validation Status (21 CFR 820.75)
- Validations on schedule: %
- Stale validations: <list>
- Statistical techniques applied: yes/no per process

## DHR Completeness (21 CFR 820.180)
- DHRs sampled: N
- Completeness rate: %
- 2-year retention compliant: yes/no
- Stratified by product class: yes/no

## CAPA Health (21 CFR 820.100)
- CAPAs sampled: N
- Root cause analysis depth: adequate/inadequate
- Effectiveness verification: complete/incomplete
- Aging CAPAs > 90 days: N

## Labeling (21 CFR 801)
- Recent products reviewed: <list>
- Labeling accurate + non-misleading: yes/no
- UDI compliance per 21 CFR 830: yes/no

## Form 483 / Warning Letter History
- Form 483s last 3 years: N (each: closed/in-progress)
- Warning Letters last 5 years: N (each: closed/in-progress)
- Pattern across observations: <thematic>

## ISO 13485 Cross-Walk (post-Feb 2026 harmonization)
- ISO 13485 audit findings: <link to cs-cqm-iso13485 output>
- FDA-specific overlays remaining: labeling + complaint handling + MDR reporting + recall procedures
- Cross-framework reuse: % of evidence shared

## Verdict
🟢 INSPECTION-READY | 🟡 GAPS-IDENTIFIED | 🔴 NOT-READY

## Top 3 Actions
[3 concrete next steps with owner + FDA-cited timeline (15 days / 30 days / etc.)]

## Outside Counsel Required
[For Warning Letter response, recall decisions, or 510(k) / PMA strategy disputes]
```

## Routing

- `/cs:compliance-readiness` — for multi-framework view
- `/cs:iso13485-audit-prep` — for ISO 13485 cross-walk pair (substantially harmonized)
- `/cs:gdpr
03

Trust audit

CAUTIONgrade B · trust 89/100 Install with care. The audit found things worth knowing before you trust its output.

LayerWhat it checksResult
L0Provenance & inventoryWARN
L1Static analysis of the codePASS
L2Instruction surface (what it tells the agent)PASS
L3Class-specific surfacePASS
L4Behavioural (sandbox)SKIPPED

What the source does

Filesystem
none-observed
Network
none-observed
Shell
none-observed
Dependencies
pinned
Secrets in source
none-found

Findings (5)

MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.codex/skills/a11y-audit
.codex/skills/a11y-audit
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.codex/skills/ab-test-setup
.codex/skills/ab-test-setup
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.codex/skills/ad-creative
.codex/skills/ad-creative
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.codex/skills/adversarial-reviewer
.codex/skills/adversarial-reviewer
Why it matters. link not followed
MEDIUMInventory / provenance · inv.symlink · CWE-1104
.codex/skills/aeo
.codex/skills/aeo
Why it matters. link not followed

Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.

Audited 2026-10-06 · audit v0.4.1 · source sha b228be08e8bdfull audit observations/trust-audit/skill/alirezarezvani__fda-qsr-audit-prep.json · Report an issue / request a re-scan
04

Audit history

Every audit this skill has had.

DateSourceVerdictGradeScoreChange
2026-10-06b228be08e8bdCAUTIONB89first audit
05

Questions

What does the Fda Qsr Audit Prep skill do?

380 Claude Code skills & agent skills & plugins (30+ Agents, 70+ custom commands, 380+ skills, customizable references, scripts)for Claude Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Cursor, and 8 more coding agents — engineering, marketing, product, compliance, C-level advisory, research, business operations, commerc

Is Fda Qsr Audit Prep safe to install?

With care. The audit graded it B (89/100) and found 5 things worth knowing before you trust this skill, listed below with the exact line each was found on.

What can Fda Qsr Audit Prep access on my machine?

The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.

How current is this page?

The grade is for one exact copy of the source (b228be08e8bd), read on 2026-10-06. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.

Advertisement