Github OpsSAFE
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Overview
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
bd656e3e97c4OBSERVED · 2026-09-20What it tells the agent
The instruction file, verbatim from the audited commit — this is the text the model reads, and the surface the audit's instruction layer examines. Quoted here so you can judge it without cloning anything.
---
name: github-ops
description: GitHub操作、自動化、APIインテグレーション、およびCI/CDワークフロー。
origin: ECC
---
# GitHub Operations
Manage GitHub repositories with a focus on community health, CI reliability, and contributor experience.
## When to Activate
- Triaging issues (classifying, labeling, responding, deduplicating)
- Managing PRs (review status, CI checks, stale PRs, merge readiness)
- Debugging CI/CD failures
- Preparing releases and changelogs
- Monitoring Dependabot and security alerts
- Managing contributor experience on open-source projects
- User says "check GitHub", "triage issues", "review PRs", "merge", "release", "CI is broken"
## Tool Requirements
- **gh CLI** for all GitHub API operations
- Repository access configured via `gh auth login`
## Issue Triage
Classify each issue by type and priority:
**Types:** bug, feature-request, question, documentation, enhancement, duplicate, invalid, good-first-issue
**Priority:** critical (breaking/security), high (significant impact), medium (nice to have), low (cosmetic)
### Triage Workflow
1. Read the issue title, body, and comments
2. Check if it duplicates an existing issue (search by keywords)
3. Apply appropriate labels via `gh issue edit --add-label`
4. For questions: draft and post a helpful response
5. For bugs needing more info: ask for reproduction steps
6. For good first issues: add `good-first-issue` label
7. For duplicates: comment with link to original, add `duplicate` label
```bash
# Search for potential duplicates
gh issue list --search "keyword" --state all --limit 20
# Add labels
gh issue edit <number> --add-label "bug,high-priority"
# Comment on issue
gh issue comment <number> --body "Thanks for reporting. Could you share reproduction steps?"
```
## PR Management
### Review Checklist
1. Check CI status: `gh pr checks <number>`
2. Check if mergeable: `gh pr view <number> --json mergeable`
3. Check age and last activity
4. Flag PRs >5 days with no review
5. For community PRs: ensure they have tests and follow conventions
### Stale Policy
- Issues with no activity in 14+ days: add `stale` label, comment asking for update
- PRs with no activity in 7+ days: comment asking if still active
- Auto-close stale issues after 30 days with no response (add `closed-stale` label)
```bash
# Find stale issues (no activity in 14+ days)
gh issue list --label "stale" --state open
# Find PRs with no recent activity
gh pr list --json number,title,updatedAt --jq '.[] | select(.updatedAt < "2026-03-01")'
```
## CI/CD Operations
When CI fails:
1. Check the workflow run: `gh run view <run-id> --log-failed`
2. Identify the failing step
3. Check if it is a flaky test vs real failure
4. For real failures: identify the root cause and suggest a fix
5. For flaky tests: note the pattern for future investigation
```bash
# List recent failed runs
gh run list --status failure --limit 10
# View failed run logs
gh run view <run-id> --log-failed
# Re-run a failed workflow
gh run rerun <run-id> --failed
```
## Release Management
When preparing a release:
1. Check all CI is green on main
2. Review unreleased changes: `gh pr list --state merged --base main`
3. Generate changelog from PR titles
4. Create release: `gh release create`
```bash
# List merged PRs since last release
gh pr list --state merged --base main --search "merged:>2026-03-01"
# Create a release
gh release create v1.2.0 --title "v1.2.0" --generate-notes
# Create a pre-release
gh release create v1.3.0-rc1 --prerelease --title "v1.3.0 Release Candidate 1"
```
## Security Monitoring
```bash
# Check Dependabot alerts
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/dependabot/alerts --jq '.[].security_advisory.summary'
# Check secret scanning alerts
gh api repos/{owner}/{repo}/secret-scanning/alerts --jq '.[].state'
# Review dependency bumps — merging is a user-authorized action (propose, never auto-merge)
gh pr list --label "dependencies" --json number,title
```
- Review safe dependency bumps and propose merges for user approval — never auto-merge
- Flag any critical/high severity alerts immediately
- Check for new Dependabot alerts weekly at minimum
## Quality Gate
Before completing any GitHub operations task:
- all issues triaged have appropriate labels
- no PRs older than 7 days without a review or comment
- CI failures have been investigated (not just re-run)
- releases include accurate changelogs
- security alerts are acknowledged and trackedTrust audit
SAFEgrade B · trust 89/100 Nothing in the source contradicts what it says it does. Grade A is reserved for packages that have also passed the behavioural sandbox.
| Layer | What it checks | Result |
|---|---|---|
| L0 | Provenance & inventory | PASS |
| L1 | Static analysis of the code | NA |
| L2 | Instruction surface (what it tells the agent) | PASS |
| L3 | Class-specific surface | PASS |
| L4 | Behavioural (sandbox) | SKIPPED |
What the source does
- Filesystem
- none-observed
- Network
- none-observed
- Shell
- none-observed
- Dependencies
- pinned
- Secrets in source
- none-found
Findings (0)
No findings outside the package's declared scope.
Gates applied: no_behavioural_pass.
bd656e3e97c4full audit observations/trust-audit/skill/affaan-m__github-ops.json · Report an issue / request a re-scanAudit history
Every audit this skill has had.
| Date | Source | Verdict | Grade | Score | Change |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-09-20 | bd656e3e97c4 | SAFE | B | 89 | first audit |
Questions
What does the Github Ops skill do?
The agent harness performance optimization system. Skills, instincts, memory, security, and research-first development for Claude Code, Codex, Opencode, Cursor and beyond.
Is Github Ops safe to install?
The audit found nothing in the source that contradicts what it says it does, and graded it B (89/100). Grade A is held back for packages that have also passed a sandboxed behavioural run, which is why a clean skill reads B.
What can Github Ops access on my machine?
The audit observed no filesystem, network or shell use at all in its source.
How current is this page?
The grade is for one exact copy of the source (bd656e3e97c4), read on 2026-09-20. The repository is watched, and a new audit runs when it changes — this is the first audit.