Auto-generated comparison

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityxAI: Grok Code Fast 1Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
256K205K🏆 xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.20$0.44🏆 xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.50$1.76🏆 xAI: Grok Code Fast 1
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 better than Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)?

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto)?

Input: $0.20 vs $0.44 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.50 vs $1.76 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) support?

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 supports up to 256K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) supports up to 205K tokens.

Do both xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) support tool calling?

xAI: Grok Code Fast 1: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto): yes.

Compare xAI: Grok Code Fast 1 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.6 (exacto) with other models