Auto-generated comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityQwen: Qwen3.7 PlusXiaomi: MiMo-V2.5Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1M1.1M🏆 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.32$0.14🏆 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.28$0.28🏆 Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus better than Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5?

Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5?

Input: $0.32 vs $0.14 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.28 vs $0.28 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 support?

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus supports up to 1M tokens. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 supports up to 1.1M tokens.

Do both Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 support tool calling?

Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus: yes. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5: yes.

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.7 Plus with other models

Compare Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 with other models