Auto-generated comparison

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B vs Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityQwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BZ.ai: GLM 4.7 FlashWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K203K🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.39$0.06🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.34$0.40🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B better than Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash?

Input: $0.39 vs $0.06 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.34 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash support?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports up to 262K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash supports up to 203K tokens.

Do both Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B and Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash support tool calling?

Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash: yes.

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.7 Flash with other models