Live survey286 models · 13 providers · 17,592 auditsAudited Using Git Worktrees · SAFE →What changedHow we verifyllms.txt

Model comparison · Updated 1 Sep 2026

Qwen3.6 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B

Qwen3.6 Plus is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.33 against $0.43 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 1M-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $322 a month for Qwen3.6 Plus and $421 for Qwen3.8 27B.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPTCClaudePPerplexityGeGeminiXGrok
More
CoCopilotAIGoogle AI Mode
Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Qwen3.6 Plus vs Qwen3.8 27B”. Retrieved 1 Sep 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/qwen/3-6-plus/vs/qwen/3-8-27b

Model A

Qwen3.6 Plus

by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD5

Input / 1M
$0.33
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026
Output / 1M$1.95
Context1M
vs

Model B

Qwen3.8 27B

by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD5

Input / 1M
$0.43
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
1 Sep 2026
Output / 1M$2.55
Context1M

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.8 27B
Input / 1M tokens
$0.33
$0.43
Output / 1M tokens
$1.95
$2.55
Batch input / output
Not listed
Not listed
Context window
1,000,000
1,000,000
Input types
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Tiers listed
standard
standard
Prices checked
2026-08-17
2026-09-01

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out
$322/mo
$421/mo
RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out
$293/mo
$383/mo
Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out
$316/mo
$413/mo

Qwen3.6 Plus   Qwen3.8 27B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

Same square. Qwen3.6 Plus and Qwen3.8 27B share D5.

Same square as Qwen3.6 Plus: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ($0.30), Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ($0.30). Open D5

AFreeB<$0.10C$0.10–0.30D$0.30–1E$1–3F$3–10G$10–30H$30+1<32K232–128K3128–256K4256K–1M51M6>1MINPUT PRICE PER 1M TOKENS →CONTEXT WINDOW ↑ · position within a square follows the real valueQwen3.7 Plus · D5DeepSeek V4.1 Flash · D5Gemini 2.5 Flash · D5Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite · D5MiniMax M3 · D5Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20 · D5Gemini 3 Flash Preview · D5Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) · D5MiniMax M1 · D5Qwen3.6 PlusQwen3.6 PlusQwen3.8 27BQwen3.8 27B
Qwen3.6 PlusQwen3.8 27BNearest neighboursOpen weights
View the map as a table (1 squares)
SquarePrice bandContext bandModels
GRIDD5$0.30–11MQwen3.6 Plus, Qwen3.8 27B, Qwen3.7 Plus, DeepSeek V4.1 Flash, Gemini 2.5 Flash, Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite, MiniMax M3, Qwen3.5 Plus 2026-04-20, Gemini 3 Flash Preview, Nemotron 3 Ultra (free), MiniMax M1

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

Qwen3.6 Plus
Qwen3.8 27B
Vision input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Audio input
Not disclosed
Not disclosed
Open weights
Not marked open
Not marked open
Batch tier
Not listed
Not listed
Free tier
Not listed
Not listed
Thinking tier
Not listed
Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose Qwen3.6 Plus if…

  • you pay by the token: it costs $0.33 per 1M input against $0.43
  • output dominates your bill: $1.95 per 1M output against $2.55

Choose Qwen3.8 27B if…

Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3.8 27B over Qwen3.6 Plus. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is Qwen3.6 Plus better than Qwen3.8 27B?
We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Qwen3.6 Plus is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.33 against $0.43 per 1M tokens) and on output. Both have a 1M-token context window. For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $322 a month for Qwen3.6 Plus and $421 for Qwen3.8 27B. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.
Which is cheaper, Qwen3.6 Plus or Qwen3.8 27B?
Qwen3.6 Plus: $0.33 against $0.43 per 1M input tokens, and $1.95 against $2.55 per 1M output, on standard pricing.
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Qwen3.6 Plus: $0.33 input and $1.95 output. Qwen3.8 27B: $0.43 input and $2.55 output. Standard tier, USD.
Which has the larger context window?
Neither: both have 1,000,000 tokens.
Do both offer batch pricing?
Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.
Can both read images or audio?
Input types recorded for Qwen3.6 Plus: none recorded. For Qwen3.8 27B: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.
Is either model open-weight?
Qwen3.6 Plus: not marked open-weight in our records. Qwen3.8 27B: not marked open-weight in our records.
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $322 a month for Qwen3.6 Plus and $421 for Qwen3.8 27B. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

Qwen3.6 Plus

By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.33 input and $1.95 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square D5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Qwen3.8 27B

By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.43 input and $2.55 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square D5. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.