Auto-generated comparison

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 vs Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityPoolside: Laguna S 2.1Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M1M🏆 Poolside: Laguna S 2.1
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.09$0.40🏆 Poolside: Laguna S 2.1
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.18$1.20🏆 Poolside: Laguna S 2.1
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 better than Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Input: $0.09 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.18 vs $1.20 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) support?

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 supports up to 1.0M tokens. Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) support tool calling?

Poolside: Laguna S 2.1: yes. Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): yes.

Compare Poolside: Laguna S 2.1 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) with other models