Your prompt will be processed by a meta-model and routed to one of dozens of models (see below), optimizing for the best possible output. To see which model was used,...
Model details →Auto Router vs Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5
Auto Router wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
MiMo-V2.5 is a native omnimodal model by Xiaomi. It delivers Pro-level agentic performance at roughly half the inference cost, while surpassing MiMo-V2-Omni in multimodal perception across image and video understanding...
Model details →Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Auto Router | Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request. | 2M | 1.1M | 🏆 Auto Router |
| Input price (per 1M) Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider. | $-1000000.00 | $0.14 | 🏆 Auto Router |
| Output price (per 1M) Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider. | $-1000000.00 | $0.28 | 🏆 Auto Router |
| Tool / function calling First-class support for emitting structured tool calls. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Vision input Accepts image inputs alongside text. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Reasoning mode Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
Frequently asked questions
Is Auto Router better than Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5?
Auto Router wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
What's the price difference between Auto Router and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5?
Input: $-1000000.00 vs $0.14 per 1M tokens. Output: $-1000000.00 vs $0.28 per 1M tokens.
What context windows do Auto Router and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 support?
Auto Router supports up to 2M tokens. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 supports up to 1.1M tokens.
Do both Auto Router and Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5 support tool calling?
Auto Router: yes. Xiaomi: MiMo-V2.5: yes.
Compare Auto Router with other models
vs Anthropic Claude Haiku Latestvs Anthropic Claude Sonnet Latestvs Anthropic: Claude Fable Latestvs Anthropic: Claude Opus Latest