OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) vs Pareto 26.9

Neither wins outright: OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) is the pick when cost matters at scale, Pareto 26.9 when you want the newer model.

Key numbers

SpecOpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch)Pareto 26.9
ProviderOpenAIUnbiased
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.63$2.50
Output price (per 1M tokens)$5.00$7.50
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$1.72$3.75
Cheaper than … of all models we track29%17%
Context window400K tokens (~600 pages)262K tokens (~393 pages)
Larger context than … of all models63%48%
Max output per response128K tokens (~96,000 words)131K tokens (~98,300 words)
Input typestext, imagetext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2025-09-232026-10-13

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch)Pareto 26.9Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$147$338OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) saves $191
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$125$375OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) saves $250
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$135$390OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) saves $255
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$80.00$245OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) saves $165
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$36.25$133OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) saves $96.25

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityOpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch)Pareto 26.9What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes—spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search✓ Yes—answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)✓ Yes—repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 54% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($147 vs $338 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need to fit long inputs in one request — 400K tokens is roughly 600 pages, against 393
  • you need reasoning / thinking mode — to spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems; Pareto 26.9 does not advertise it
  • you need built-in web search — to answer from live web results; Pareto 26.9 does not advertise it
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Pareto 26.9 does not advertise it

Choose Pareto 26.9 if…

  • you want the newer model — released 2026-10-13, 13 months after the other

Frequently asked questions

Is OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) better than Pareto 26.9?

Neither wins outright: OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) is the pick when cost matters at scale, Pareto 26.9 when you want the newer model. In short: OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) when cost matters at scale, you need to fit long inputs in one request, you need reasoning / thinking mode, you need built-in web search, you need seed (reproducible sampling); Pareto 26.9 when you want the newer model.

Which is cheaper, OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) or Pareto 26.9?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) is cheaper: $1.72 vs $3.75 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 54% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $147 against $338.

How much do OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) and Pareto 26.9 cost per million tokens?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) costs $0.63 per 1M input tokens and $5.00 per 1M output tokens; Pareto 26.9 costs $2.50 input and $7.50 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) or Pareto 26.9?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch): 400K tokens, about 600 pages, against 262K (about 393 pages) for Pareto 26.9.

Do OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) and Pareto 26.9 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch): yes, Pareto 26.9: yes. JSON-schema structured output — OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch): yes, Pareto 26.9: yes.

Can OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) or Pareto 26.9 read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) or Pareto 26.9 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) and Pareto 26.9?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) can write up to 128K tokens (about 96,000 words) per response; Pareto 26.9 up to 131K (about 98,300 words).

When were OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) and Pareto 26.9 released?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) was listed on 2025-09-23; Pareto 26.9 on 2026-10-13.

About the two models

Unbiased

Pareto 26.9

Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks.

Full Pareto 26.9 specs →

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5 Codex (batch) with other models

Compare Pareto 26.9 with other models

Advertisement