Auto-generated comparison

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL vs Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityNVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VLQwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B InstructWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K128K🏆 NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.20$0.20Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.60$0.60Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Tie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL

Frequently asked questions

Is NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL better than Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL and Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct?

Input: $0.20 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.60 vs $0.60 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL and Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support?

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL supports up to 131K tokens. Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct supports up to 128K tokens.

Do both NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL and Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct support tool calling?

NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL: not advertised. Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct: not advertised.

Compare NVIDIA: Nemotron Nano 12B 2 VL with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen2.5 VL 32B Instruct with other models