Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.7 Flash
Qwen3.7 Flash is about 2× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.06 per 1M tokens) and on output. Qwen3.7 Flash has the larger context window (1M against 262K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $48.60 a month for Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B and $25.20 for Qwen3.7 Flash.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B vs Qwen3.7 Flash”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/nvidia/nemotron-3-nano-30b-a3b/vs/qwen/3-7
Model A
by NVIDIA · weights not marked open · GRIDB4
$0.06
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDB5
$0.03
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B Qwen3.7 Flash · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3.7 Flash (B5) sits 1 context band larger than Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B (B4).
Same square as Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B: Gemma 4 26B A4B ($0.07), Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct ($0.07), Nemotron 3 Super ($0.08). Same square as Qwen3.7 Flash: Qwen3.5-Flash ($0.07), Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free) ($0.07), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 ($0.08). Open B4 · Open B5
View the map as a table (2 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Gemma 4 26B A4B, Qwen3 Coder 30B A3B Instruct, Nemotron 3 Super, Qwen3.5-35B-A3B, Gemma 4 31B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.7 Flash, Qwen3.5-Flash, Nemotron 3.5 Lightning (free), DeepSeek V4 Flash 0731 |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B over Qwen3.7 Flash. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with NVIDIA.
Choose Qwen3.7 Flash if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.03 per 1M input against $0.06
- output dominates your bill: $0.13 per 1M output against $0.24
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,000,000 tokens against 262,144
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B
By NVIDIA. $0.06 input and $0.24 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.7 Flash
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.03 input and $0.13 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square B5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B with…
Compare Qwen3.7 Flash with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B better than Qwen3.7 Flash?
- Which is cheaper, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B or Qwen3.7 Flash?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?