Auto-generated comparison

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 vs Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.42$0.39🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.20$2.34🏆 MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 better than Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B?

Input: $0.42 vs $0.39 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.20 vs $2.34 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B support?

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 supports up to 262K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 and Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B support tool calling?

MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5: yes. Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B: yes.

Compare MoonshotAI: Kimi K2.5 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5 397B A17B with other models