Auto-generated comparison

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6V

Z.ai: GLM 4.6V wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch)Z.ai: GLM 4.6VWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K131KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.40$0.30🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6V
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.00$0.90🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6V
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6V

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) better than Z.ai: GLM 4.6V?

Z.ai: GLM 4.6V wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Z.ai: GLM 4.6V?

Input: $0.40 vs $0.30 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.00 vs $0.90 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Z.ai: GLM 4.6V support?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) supports up to 131K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.6V supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) and Z.ai: GLM 4.6V support tool calling?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch): yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.6V: yes.

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.1 (batch) with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.6V with other models