Auto-generated comparison

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Z.ai: GLM 4.6

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Z.ai: GLM 4.6Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K205K🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$1.50$0.50🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$7.50$2.00🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4.6
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Z.ai: GLM 4.6?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6?

Input: $1.50 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens. Output: $7.50 vs $2.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 support?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 supports up to 262K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4.6 supports up to 205K tokens.

Do both Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Z.ai: GLM 4.6 support tool calling?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4.6: yes.

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4.6 with other models