Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 vs Pareto 26.9

Neither wins outright: Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is the pick when cost matters at scale, Pareto 26.9 when you want the newer model.

Key numbers

SpecMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Pareto 26.9
ProviderMistral AIUnbiased
Input price (per 1M tokens)$1.50$2.50
Output price (per 1M tokens)$7.50$7.50
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$3.00$3.75
Cheaper than … of all models we track21%17%
Context window262K tokens (~393 pages)262K tokens (~393 pages)
Larger context than … of all models48%48%
Max output per response210K tokens (~157,300 words)131K tokens (~98,300 words)
Input typestext, image, filetext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantNoNo
Listed since2026-04-302026-10-13

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Pareto 26.9Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$263$338Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 saves $75.00
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$255$375Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 saves $120
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$270$390Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 saves $120
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$165$245Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 saves $80.00
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$82.50$133Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 saves $50.00

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityMistral: Mistral Medium 3.5Pareto 26.9What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes—spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input✓ Yes—accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)✓ Yes—repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

Which should you choose?

Choose Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 20% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($263 vs $338 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need reasoning / thinking mode — to spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems; Pareto 26.9 does not advertise it
  • you need file / PDF input — to accept documents without your own parsing step; Pareto 26.9 does not advertise it
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Pareto 26.9 does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 210K tokens (about 157,300 words) per response

Choose Pareto 26.9 if…

  • you want the newer model — released 2026-10-13, 6 months after the other

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 better than Pareto 26.9?

Neither wins outright: Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is the pick when cost matters at scale, Pareto 26.9 when you want the newer model. In short: Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 when cost matters at scale, you need reasoning / thinking mode, you need file / PDF input, you need seed (reproducible sampling), you generate long outputs in one go; Pareto 26.9 when you want the newer model.

Which is cheaper, Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 or Pareto 26.9?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 is cheaper: $3.00 vs $3.75 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 20% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $263 against $338.

How much do Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Pareto 26.9 cost per million tokens?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 costs $1.50 per 1M input tokens and $7.50 per 1M output tokens; Pareto 26.9 costs $2.50 input and $7.50 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 or Pareto 26.9?

Both take 262K tokens per request — roughly 393 pages of text.

Do Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Pareto 26.9 support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: yes, Pareto 26.9: yes. JSON-schema structured output — Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5: yes, Pareto 26.9: yes.

Can Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 or Pareto 26.9 read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 or Pareto 26.9 free to use?

No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.

What is the maximum output length of Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Pareto 26.9?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 can write up to 210K tokens (about 157,300 words) per response; Pareto 26.9 up to 131K (about 98,300 words).

When were Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 and Pareto 26.9 released?

Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 was listed on 2026-04-30; Pareto 26.9 on 2026-10-13.

About the two models

Unbiased

Pareto 26.9

Pareto is a multimodal composite model built for research, coding, and agentic workflows, while delivering frontier-level performance across a broad range of general-purpose tasks.

Full Pareto 26.9 specs →

Compare Mistral: Mistral Medium 3.5 with other models

Compare Pareto 26.9 with other models

Advertisement