Auto-generated comparison

Mistral: Devstral Medium vs Z.ai: GLM 4 32B

Z.ai: GLM 4 32B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMistral: Devstral MediumZ.ai: GLM 4 32BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
131K128K🏆 Mistral: Devstral Medium
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.40$0.10🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4 32B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$2.00$0.10🏆 Z.ai: GLM 4 32B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Mistral: Devstral Medium better than Z.ai: GLM 4 32B?

Z.ai: GLM 4 32B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Mistral: Devstral Medium and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B?

Input: $0.40 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $2.00 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Mistral: Devstral Medium and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B support?

Mistral: Devstral Medium supports up to 131K tokens. Z.ai: GLM 4 32B supports up to 128K tokens.

Do both Mistral: Devstral Medium and Z.ai: GLM 4 32B support tool calling?

Mistral: Devstral Medium: yes. Z.ai: GLM 4 32B: yes.

Compare Mistral: Devstral Medium with other models

Compare Z.ai: GLM 4 32B with other models