Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
MiniMax M1 and Qwen3.5 397B A17B cost the same on input, $0.55 per 1M tokens. MiniMax M1 has the larger context window (1M against 262K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $446 a month for MiniMax M1 and $563 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “MiniMax M1 vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/minimax/m1/vs/qwen/3-5-397b-a17b
Model A
by MiniMax · weights not marked open · GRIDD5
$0.55
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 1 Sep 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD4
$0.55
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
MiniMax M1 Qwen3.5 397B A17B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3.5 397B A17B (D4) sits 1 context band smaller than MiniMax M1 (D5).
Same square as MiniMax M1: DeepSeek V4.1 Flash ($0.30), Gemini 2.5 Flash ($0.30), Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite ($0.30). Same square as Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ($0.30), Qwen3.6 27B ($0.32), Devstral 2 2512 ($0.40). Open D5 · Open D4
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) |
| GRIDD4 | $0.30–1 | 256K–1M | Qwen3.5 397B A17B, Devstral 2 2512, Qwen3.6 27B, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| GRIDD5 | $0.30–1 | 1M | MiniMax M1, Gemini 3 Flash Preview, Nemotron 3 Ultra (free), Mistral Large 4, Qwen3.8 27B, Gemini 3.6 Flash, Gemini 3.7 Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose MiniMax M1 if…
- output dominates your bill: $2.20 per 1M output against $3.50
- your prompts are long: it takes 1,000,000 tokens against 262,144
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Qwen3.5 397B A17B over MiniMax M1. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Qwen (Alibaba).
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
MiniMax M1
By MiniMax. $0.55 input and $2.20 output per 1M tokens, 1M context, atlas square D5. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.5 397B A17B
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.55 input and $3.50 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square D4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare MiniMax M1 with…
Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is MiniMax M1 better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- Which is cheaper, MiniMax M1 or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?