Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) is about 1.1× cheaper on input ($0.50 against $0.55 per 1M tokens) and on output. Qwen3.5 397B A17B has the larger context window (262K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $495 a month for Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) and $563 for Qwen3.5 397B A17B.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) vs Qwen3.5 397B A17B”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemini-3-1-flash-image/vs/qwen/3-5-397b-a17b
Model A
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDD3
$0.50
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 17 Aug 2026
Model B
by Qwen (Alibaba) · weights not marked open · GRIDD4
$0.55
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) Qwen3.5 397B A17B · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Qwen3.5 397B A17B (D4) sits 1 context band larger than Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) (D3).
Same square as Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image): Codestral 2508 ($0.30), Command A+ ($0.30), MiniMax M2 ($0.30). Same square as Qwen3.5 397B A17B: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B ($0.30), Qwen3.6 27B ($0.32), Devstral 2 2512 ($0.40). Open D3 · Open D4
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDD3 | $0.30–1 | 128–256K | Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image), Llama 3.1 70B Instruct, Mistral Medium 3, Mistral Medium 3.1, R1 0528, DeepSeek V3, Command A+ |
| GRIDD4 | $0.30–1 | 256K–1M | Qwen3.5 397B A17B, Devstral 2 2512, Qwen3.6 27B, Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B |
| GRIDD5 | $0.30–1 | 1M | MiniMax M1, Gemini 3 Flash Preview |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.50 per 1M input against $0.55
- output dominates your bill: $3.00 per 1M output against $3.50
Choose Qwen3.5 397B A17B if…
- your prompts are long: it takes 262,144 tokens against 131,072
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image)
By Google. $0.50 input and $3.00 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square D3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Qwen3.5 397B A17B
By Qwen (Alibaba). $0.55 input and $3.50 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square D4. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) with…
Compare Qwen3.5 397B A17B with…
- Devstral 2 2512$0.40
- Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B$0.30
- Qwen3.6 27B$0.32
- MiniMax M1$0.55
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) better than Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- Which is cheaper, Nano Banana 2 (Gemini 3.1 Flash Image) or Qwen3.5 397B A17B?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?