[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion parameters, it was trained on a…
Model details →Microsoft: Phi 4 vs Reka Edge
Reka Edge wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
Reka Edge is an extremely efficient 7B multimodal vision-language model that accepts image/video+text inputs and generates text outputs. This model is optimized specifically to deliver industry-leading performance in image understanding, vi…
Model details →Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Microsoft: Phi 4 | Reka Edge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request. | 16K | 16K | Tie |
| Input price (per 1M) Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider. | $0.07 | $0.10 | 🏆 Microsoft: Phi 4 |
| Output price (per 1M) Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider. | $0.14 | $0.10 | 🏆 Reka Edge |
| Tool / function calling First-class support for emitting structured tool calls. | — | Yes | 🏆 Reka Edge |
| Vision input Accepts image inputs alongside text. | — | Yes | 🏆 Reka Edge |
| Reasoning mode Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support. | — | — | Tie |
Frequently asked questions
Is Microsoft: Phi 4 better than Reka Edge?
Reka Edge wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
What's the price difference between Microsoft: Phi 4 and Reka Edge?
Input: $0.07 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.14 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens.
What context windows do Microsoft: Phi 4 and Reka Edge support?
Microsoft: Phi 4 supports up to 16K tokens. Reka Edge supports up to 16K tokens.
Do both Microsoft: Phi 4 and Reka Edge support tool calling?
Microsoft: Phi 4: not advertised. Reka Edge: yes.