[Microsoft Research](/microsoft) Phi-4 is designed to perform well in complex reasoning tasks and can operate efficiently in situations with limited memory or where quick responses are needed. At 14 billion...
Model details →Microsoft: Phi 4 vs Reka Edge
Reka Edge wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
Reka Edge is an extremely efficient 7B multimodal vision-language model that accepts image/video+text inputs and generates text outputs. This model is optimized specifically to deliver industry-leading performance in image understanding, vi…
Model details →Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Microsoft: Phi 4 | Reka Edge | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request. | 16K | 16K | Tie |
| Input price (per 1M) Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider. | $0.07 | $0.10 | 🏆 Microsoft: Phi 4 |
| Output price (per 1M) Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider. | $0.14 | $0.10 | 🏆 Reka Edge |
| Tool / function calling First-class support for emitting structured tool calls. | — | Yes | 🏆 Reka Edge |
| Vision input Accepts image inputs alongside text. | — | Yes | 🏆 Reka Edge |
| Reasoning mode Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support. | — | — | Tie |
Frequently asked questions
Is Microsoft: Phi 4 better than Reka Edge?
Reka Edge wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
What's the price difference between Microsoft: Phi 4 and Reka Edge?
Input: $0.07 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.14 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens.
What context windows do Microsoft: Phi 4 and Reka Edge support?
Microsoft: Phi 4 supports up to 16K tokens. Reka Edge supports up to 16K tokens.
Do both Microsoft: Phi 4 and Reka Edge support tool calling?
Microsoft: Phi 4: not advertised. Reka Edge: yes.