Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama Guard 4 12BQwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B ThinkingWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
164K131K🏆 Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.18$0.26🏆 Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.18$2.60🏆 Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B better than Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking?

Input: $0.18 vs $0.26 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.18 vs $2.60 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support?

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B supports up to 164K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking support tool calling?

Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B: not advertised. Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama Guard 4 12B with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 VL 235B A22B Thinking with other models