Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 4 ScoutQwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
328K262K🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.08$0.22🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$1.80🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Tie

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout wins on 4 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto)?

Input: $0.08 vs $0.22 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.30 vs $1.80 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) support?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 328K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 4 Scout and Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes. Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto): yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 Coder 480B A35B (exacto) with other models