Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 4 Scout vs OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 4 ScoutOpenAI: GPT-5 NanoWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
328K400K🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.08$0.05🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$0.40🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Scout
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 4 Scout better than OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano?

OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 4 Scout and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano?

Input: $0.08 vs $0.05 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.30 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 4 Scout and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano support?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout supports up to 328K tokens. OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano supports up to 400K tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 4 Scout and OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 4 Scout: yes. OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Scout with other models

Compare OpenAI: GPT-5 Nano with other models