Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs xAI: Grok 4 Fast

xAI: Grok 4 Fast wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 4 MaverickxAI: Grok 4 FastWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M2M🏆 xAI: Grok 4 Fast
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.15$0.20🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.60$0.50🏆 xAI: Grok 4 Fast
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 xAI: Grok 4 Fast

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 4 Maverick better than xAI: Grok 4 Fast?

xAI: Grok 4 Fast wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and xAI: Grok 4 Fast?

Input: $0.15 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.60 vs $0.50 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and xAI: Grok 4 Fast support?

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1.0M tokens. xAI: Grok 4 Fast supports up to 2M tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and xAI: Grok 4 Fast support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick: yes. xAI: Grok 4 Fast: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Maverick with other models

Compare xAI: Grok 4 Fast with other models