Auto-generated comparison

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeta: Llama 4 MaverickQwen: Qwen3.5-FlashWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M1M🏆 Meta: Llama 4 Maverick
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.15$0.07🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.60$0.26🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash

Frequently asked questions

Is Meta: Llama 4 Maverick better than Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash?

Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash?

Input: $0.15 vs $0.07 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.60 vs $0.26 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash support?

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick supports up to 1.0M tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Meta: Llama 4 Maverick and Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash support tool calling?

Meta: Llama 4 Maverick: yes. Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash: yes.

Compare Meta: Llama 4 Maverick with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5-Flash with other models