Auto-generated comparison

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 vs Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityMeituan: LongCat 2.0Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
1.0M1M🏆 Meituan: LongCat 2.0
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.30$0.40🏆 Meituan: LongCat 2.0
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$1.20$1.20Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Meituan: LongCat 2.0 better than Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking)?

Input: $0.30 vs $0.40 per 1M tokens. Output: $1.20 vs $1.20 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) support?

Meituan: LongCat 2.0 supports up to 1.0M tokens. Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) supports up to 1M tokens.

Do both Meituan: LongCat 2.0 and Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) support tool calling?

Meituan: LongCat 2.0: yes. Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking): yes.

Compare Meituan: LongCat 2.0 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen Plus 0728 (thinking) with other models