Auto-generated comparison

inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash vs Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking

inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityinclusionAI: Ling 3.1 FlashQwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B ThinkingWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.20🏆 inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$2.40🏆 inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
—Yes🏆 Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash better than Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking?

Input: $0.00 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.00 vs $2.40 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash supports up to 262K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash and Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking support tool calling?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash: yes. Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking: yes.

Compare inclusionAI: Ling 3.1 Flash with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 VL 30B A3B Thinking with other models