inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety

Neither wins outright: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the pick when cost matters at scale, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety when you generate long outputs in one go.

Key numbers

SpecinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety
ProviderInclusionaiNvidia
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.06$0.20
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.18$0.20
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$0.09$0.20
Cheaper than … of all models we track82%69%
Context window131K tokens (~197 pages)131K tokens (~197 pages)
Larger context than … of all models22%22%
Max output per response33K tokens (~24,600 words)118K tokens (~88,500 words)
Input typestext, image, videotext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantYesYes
Listed since2026-09-102026-06-04
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyDifference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$8.10$19.00inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $10.90
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$9.00$26.00inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $17.00
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$9.36$26.40inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $17.04
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$5.88$17.20inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $11.32
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$3.18$10.20inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $7.02

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content SafetyWhat it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes—call your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes—return JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)✓ Yes✓ Yesrepeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities——read token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

DateModelInput / 1MOutput / 1M
2026-10-14inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.06$0.18
2026-09-26inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.02$0.06

Which should you choose?

Choose inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 55% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($8.10 vs $19.00 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need tool / function calling — to call your APIs and run agent loops; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety does not advertise it
  • you need structured output (JSON schema) — to return JSON that validates against your schema; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety does not advertise it
  • you want the newer model — released 2026-09-10, 3 months after the other

Choose NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety if…

  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 118K tokens (about 88,500 words) per response

Frequently asked questions

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL better than NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Neither wins outright: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the pick when cost matters at scale, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety when you generate long outputs in one go. In short: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL when cost matters at scale, you need tool / function calling, you need structured output (JSON schema), you want the newer model; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety when you generate long outputs in one go.

Which is cheaper, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper: $0.09 vs $0.20 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 55% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $8.10 against $19.00.

How much do inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety cost per million tokens?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.18 per 1M output tokens; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety costs $0.20 input and $0.20 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

Both take 131K tokens per request — roughly 197 pages of text.

Do inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: yes, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: not advertised. JSON-schema structured output — inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: yes, NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: not advertised.

Can inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety free to use?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a free variant (inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl:free); NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety has a free variant (nvidia/nemotron-3.5-content-safety:free). Free variants usually carry tighter rate limits.

What is the maximum output length of inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL can write up to 33K tokens (about 24,600 words) per response; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety up to 118K (about 88,500 words).

When were inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety released?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL was listed on 2026-09-10; NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety on 2026-06-04.

Has the price of inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety changed?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: input price raised 65% ($0.02 → $0.06/1M), output price raised 66% ($0.06 → $0.18/1M) on 2026-10-14 (2 price changes since 2026-09-12). NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety: price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-09-04.

About the two models

Compare inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL with other models

Compare NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Content Safety with other models

Advertisement