inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL vs Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)

Neither wins outright: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the pick when cost matters at scale, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when you need log-probabilities.

Key numbers

SpecinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)
ProviderinclusionAIMeta
Input price (per 1M tokens)$0.06$0.17
Output price (per 1M tokens)$0.18$0.75
Blended price (3:1 input/output)$0.09$0.32
Cheaper than … of all models we track82%62%
Context window131K tokens (~197 pages)131K tokens (~197 pages)
Larger context than … of all models22%22%
Max output per response33K tokens (~24,600 words)118K tokens (~88,500 words)
Input typestext, image, videotext, image
Output typestexttext
Free variantYesNo
Listed since2026-09-102026-08-09
Advertisement

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.

Workload (per month)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$8.10$28.12inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $20.02
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$9.00$28.50inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $19.50
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$9.36$30.00inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $20.64
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$5.88$18.50inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $12.62
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$3.18$9.50inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL saves $6.32

Capabilities side by side

CapabilityinclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VLMeta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)What it lets you do
Tool / function calling✓ Yes✓ Yescall your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)✓ Yes✓ Yesreturn JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode✓ Yes✓ Yesspend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input✓ Yes✓ Yesread screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input——take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input——accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output——generate images, not just text
Built-in web search——answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)✓ Yes—repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities—✓ Yesread token confidence for classification and scoring

From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.

Price history

DateModelInput / 1MOutput / 1M
2026-10-14inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.06$0.18
2026-09-26inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL$0.02$0.06
2026-09-09Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)$0.17$0.75

Which should you choose?

Choose inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL if…

  • cost matters at scale — it is 72% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($8.10 vs $28.12 a month for 50,000 support chats)
  • you need seed (reproducible sampling) — to repeat a generation for tests and evals; Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) does not advertise it
  • you want to prototype at zero cost — a free variant is listed

Choose Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) if…

  • you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL does not advertise it
  • you generate long outputs in one go — up to 118K tokens (about 88,500 words) per response

Frequently asked questions

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL better than Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)?

Neither wins outright: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is the pick when cost matters at scale, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when you need log-probabilities. In short: inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL when cost matters at scale, you need seed (reproducible sampling), you want to prototype at zero cost; Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) when you need log-probabilities, you generate long outputs in one go.

Which is cheaper, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL is cheaper: $0.09 vs $0.32 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 72% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $8.10 against $28.12.

How much do inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) cost per million tokens?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL costs $0.06 per 1M input tokens and $0.18 per 1M output tokens; Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) costs $0.17 input and $0.75 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.

Which has the bigger context window, inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)?

Both take 131K tokens per request — roughly 197 pages of text.

Do inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) support function calling and JSON output?

Tool calling — inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: yes, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch): yes. JSON-schema structured output — inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: yes, Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch): yes.

Can inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) read images?

Yes, both accept image input.

Is inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) free to use?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL has a free variant (inclusionai/ling-3.0-flash-vl:free). Free variants usually carry tighter rate limits.

What is the maximum output length of inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch)?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL can write up to 33K tokens (about 24,600 words) per response; Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) up to 118K (about 88,500 words).

When were inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL and Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) released?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL was listed on 2026-09-10; Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) on 2026-08-09.

Has the price of inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL or Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) changed?

inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL: input price raised 65% ($0.02 → $0.06/1M), output price raised 66% ($0.06 → $0.18/1M) on 2026-10-14 (2 price changes since 2026-09-12). Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch): input price cut 50% ($0.35 → $0.17/1M), output price cut 50% ($1.50 → $0.75/1M) on 2026-09-09.

About the two models

Compare inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Flash VL with other models

Compare Meta: Muse Glimmer 30B (batch) with other models

Advertisement