Auto-generated comparison

Inception: Mercury 2 vs Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityInception: Mercury 2Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B ThinkingWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
128K131K🏆 Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.25$0.10🏆 Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.75$0.78🏆 Inception: Mercury 2
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Tie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Inception: Mercury 2 better than Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Inception: Mercury 2 and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking?

Input: $0.25 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.75 vs $0.78 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Inception: Mercury 2 and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking support?

Inception: Mercury 2 supports up to 128K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking supports up to 131K tokens.

Do both Inception: Mercury 2 and Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking support tool calling?

Inception: Mercury 2: yes. Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking: yes.

Compare Inception: Mercury 2 with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Thinking with other models