Choose Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview if…
- cost matters at scale — it is 71% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($6.00 vs $20.00 a month for 50,000 support chats)
- you want the newer model — released 2026-08-31, 6 months after the other
Neither wins outright: Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview is the pick when cost matters at scale, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) when you need to fit long inputs in one request.
| Spec | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | Inception | OpenAI |
| Input price (per 1M tokens) | $0.04 | $0.10 |
| Output price (per 1M tokens) | $0.15 | $0.63 |
| Blended price (3:1 input/output) | $0.07 | $0.23 |
| Cheaper than … of all models we track | 85% | 67% |
| Context window | 260K tokens (~390 pages) | 400K tokens (~600 pages) |
| Larger context than … of all models | 47% | 63% |
| Max output per response | 66K tokens (~49,200 words) | 128K tokens (~96,000 words) |
| Input types | text | file, image, text |
| Output types | text | text |
| Free variant | No | No |
| Listed since | 2026-08-31 | 2026-03-17 |
Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.
| Workload (per month) | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) | Difference |
|---|---|---|---|
| Customer-support chatbot 50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens) | $6.00 | $20.00 | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview saves $14.00 |
| RAG search over documents 20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens) | $6.30 | $18.25 | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview saves $11.95 |
| Coding / tool-using agent 2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens) | $6.60 | $19.50 | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview saves $12.90 |
| Batch summarisation 10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens) | $4.10 | $11.75 | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview saves $7.65 |
| Long-document analysis 500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens) | $2.15 | $5.63 | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview saves $3.48 |
| Capability | Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview | OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) | What it lets you do |
|---|---|---|---|
| Tool / function calling | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | call your APIs and run agent loops |
| Structured output (JSON schema) | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | return JSON that validates against your schema |
| Reasoning / thinking mode | ✓ Yes | ✓ Yes | spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems |
| Image input | — | ✓ Yes | read screenshots, charts and scanned pages |
| Audio input | — | — | take speech or audio directly |
| File / PDF input | — | ✓ Yes | accept documents without your own parsing step |
| Image output | — | — | generate images, not just text |
| Built-in web search | — | ✓ Yes | answer from live web results |
| Seed (reproducible sampling) | — | ✓ Yes | repeat a generation for tests and evals |
| Log-probabilities | — | — | read token confidence for classification and scoring |
From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.
Neither wins outright: Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview is the pick when cost matters at scale, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) when you need to fit long inputs in one request. In short: Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview when cost matters at scale, you want the newer model; OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) when you need to fit long inputs in one request, you need image input, you need file / PDF input, you need built-in web search, you need seed (reproducible sampling), you generate long outputs in one go.
Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview is cheaper: $0.07 vs $0.23 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 71% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $6.00 against $20.00.
Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview costs $0.04 per 1M input tokens and $0.15 per 1M output tokens; OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) costs $0.10 input and $0.63 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.
OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch): 400K tokens, about 600 pages, against 260K (about 390 pages) for Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview.
Tool calling — Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview: yes, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch): yes. JSON-schema structured output — Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview: yes, OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch): yes.
Only OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) accepts image input; Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview is text-only for input.
No free variant is listed for either; both are pay-per-token.
Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview can write up to 66K tokens (about 49,200 words) per response; OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) up to 128K (about 96,000 words).
Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview was listed on 2026-08-31; OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) on 2026-03-17.
Mercury 2.5 is the fastest reasoning LLM, and the latest diffusion LLM (dLLM) from Inception. Instead of generating tokens sequentially, Mercury 2.5 produces and refines multiple tokens in parallel, achieving...
Full Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview specs →GPT-5.4 nano is the most lightweight and cost-efficient variant of the GPT-5.4 family, optimized for speed-critical and high-volume tasks. It supports text and image inputs and is designed for low-latency...
Full OpenAI: GPT-5.4 Nano (batch) specs →