Gemma 4 31B Instruct is Google DeepMind's 30.7B dense multimodal model supporting text and image input with text output. Features a 256K token context window, configurable thinking/reasoning mode, native function...
Model details →Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Upstage: Solar Pro 4
Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
Solar Pro 4 is Upstage's cost-efficient large language model, featuring a 524K context window. It is built for long-horizon tasks and agentic workflows, with strong capabilities in office productivity, document-intensive...
Model details →Side-by-side comparison
| Capability | Google: Gemma 4 31B | Upstage: Solar Pro 4 | Winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Context window Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request. | 262K | 524K | 🏆 Upstage: Solar Pro 4 |
| Input price (per 1M) Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider. | $0.09 | $0.09 | Tie |
| Output price (per 1M) Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider. | $0.34 | $0.36 | 🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B |
| Tool / function calling First-class support for emitting structured tool calls. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
| Vision input Accepts image inputs alongside text. | Yes | — | 🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B |
| Reasoning mode Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support. | Yes | Yes | Tie |
Frequently asked questions
Is Google: Gemma 4 31B better than Upstage: Solar Pro 4?
Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.
What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Upstage: Solar Pro 4?
Input: $0.09 vs $0.09 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.34 vs $0.36 per 1M tokens.
What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 31B and Upstage: Solar Pro 4 support?
Google: Gemma 4 31B supports up to 262K tokens. Upstage: Solar Pro 4 supports up to 524K tokens.
Do both Google: Gemma 4 31B and Upstage: Solar Pro 4 support tool calling?
Google: Gemma 4 31B: yes. Upstage: Solar Pro 4: yes.