Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 31BQwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3BWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.10$0.14🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.34$1.00🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
YesYesTie
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B better than Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B?

Input: $0.10 vs $0.14 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.34 vs $1.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B support?

Google: Gemma 4 31B supports up to 262K tokens. Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 31B and Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 31B: yes. Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B with other models

Compare Qwen: Qwen3.5-35B-A3B with other models