Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 31BNVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 LightningWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.10$0.10Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.34$0.25🏆 NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B better than NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 2 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 31B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning?

Input: $0.10 vs $0.10 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.34 vs $0.25 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 31B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning support?

Google: Gemma 4 31B supports up to 262K tokens. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 31B and NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 31B: yes. NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning: not advertised.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B with other models

Compare NVIDIA: Nemotron 3.5 Lightning with other models