Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B vs Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 31BKwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K256K🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.10$0.15🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.34$0.60🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B better than Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5?

Google: Gemma 4 31B wins on 5 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 31B and Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5?

Input: $0.10 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.34 vs $0.60 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 31B and Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 support?

Google: Gemma 4 31B supports up to 262K tokens. Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 supports up to 256K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 31B and Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 31B: yes. Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B with other models

Compare Kwaipilot: KAT-Coder-Air V2.5 with other models