Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) vs inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)

Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 31B (free)inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.00Tie
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.00$0.00Tie
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B (free)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) better than inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?

Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) wins on 1 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) and inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free)?

Input: $0.00 vs $0.00 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.00 vs $0.00 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) and inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) support?

Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) supports up to 262K tokens. inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) and inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 31B (free): yes. inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free): yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B (free) with other models

Compare inclusionAI: Ling 3.0 Tiny (free) with other models