Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) vs Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview

Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) and Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 31B (batch)Inception: Mercury 2.5 PreviewWinner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K260K🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch)
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.39$0.04🏆 Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.97$0.15🏆 Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch)
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) better than Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview?

Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) and Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview are evenly matched on 6 axes — pick the one whose provider, latency, or licensing fits your stack.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) and Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview?

Input: $0.39 vs $0.04 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.97 vs $0.15 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) and Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview support?

Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) supports up to 262K tokens. Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview supports up to 260K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) and Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch): yes. Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 31B (batch) with other models

Compare Inception: Mercury 2.5 Preview with other models