Monthly cost at list price for five common workloads. Token counts per unit are stated so you can scale them to your own traffic. A workload that does not fit a model's context window is marked rather than priced.
Workload (per month)
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)
Difference
Customer-support chatbot
50,000 conversations — each a 6-turn conversation (1,500 in / 400 out tokens)
$9.56
$0
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) saves $9.56
RAG search over documents
20,000 questions — each a question answered from ~8 retrieved passages (6,000 in / 500 out tokens)
$10.35
$0
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) saves $10.35
Coding / tool-using agent
2,000 tasks — each a multi-step task with tool calls and file context (60,000 in / 6,000 out tokens)
$10.80
$0
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) saves $10.80
Batch summarisation
10,000 documents — each a 6,000-word report summarised to a page (8,000 in / 600 out tokens)
$6.75
$0
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) saves $6.75
Long-document analysis
500 documents — each a 150-page contract or codebase read in one pass (100,000 in / 2,000 out tokens)
$3.60
$0
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) saves $3.60
Capabilities side by side
Capability
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)
What it lets you do
Tool / function calling
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
call your APIs and run agent loops
Structured output (JSON schema)
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
return JSON that validates against your schema
Reasoning / thinking mode
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
spend extra tokens thinking before answering hard problems
Image input
✓ Yes
—
read screenshots, charts and scanned pages
Audio input
—
—
take speech or audio directly
File / PDF input
—
—
accept documents without your own parsing step
Image output
—
—
generate images, not just text
Built-in web search
—
—
answer from live web results
Seed (reproducible sampling)
✓ Yes
✓ Yes
repeat a generation for tests and evals
Log-probabilities
✓ Yes
—
read token confidence for classification and scoring
From each model's published parameters and input/output types. “—” means not advertised, not proven absent.
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free): price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-10-17.
Date
Model
Input / 1M
Output / 1M
2026-10-17
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.07
$0.23
2026-10-13
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.08
$0.26
2026-10-10
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.07
$0.23
2026-10-06
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.08
$0.26
2026-10-03
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.07
$0.23
2026-09-29
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.08
$0.26
2026-09-26
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.07
$0.23
2026-09-13
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
$0.09
$0.30
Which should you choose?
Choose Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
you need image input — to read screenshots, charts and scanned pages; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) does not advertise it
you need log-probabilities — to read token confidence for classification and scoring; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) does not advertise it
Choose XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) if…
cost matters at scale — it is 100% cheaper on a typical 3:1 input/output mix ($0 vs $9.56 a month for 50,000 support chats)
you want the newer model — released 2026-10-16, 7 months after the other
Frequently asked questions
Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B better than XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Neither wins outright: Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B is the pick when you need image input, XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) when cost matters at scale. In short: Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B when you need image input, you need log-probabilities; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) when cost matters at scale, you want the newer model.
Which is cheaper, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is cheaper: $0 vs $0.11 per 1M tokens at a typical 3:1 input/output mix, 100% less. For 50,000 support conversations a month that is $0 against $9.56.
How much do Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) cost per million tokens?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B costs $0.07 per 1M input tokens and $0.23 per 1M output tokens; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) costs $0 input and $0 output. Output tokens are billed separately, so long answers shift the gap.
Which has the bigger context window, Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Both take 262K tokens per request — roughly 393 pages of text.
Do Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) support function calling and JSON output?
Can Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) read images?
Only Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B accepts image input; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) is text-only for input.
Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) free to use?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B has a free variant (google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it:free); XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) has a free variant (xingchen-agi/xing4.0-29b-a4b:free). Free variants usually carry tighter rate limits.
What is the maximum output length of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free)?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B can write up to 236K tokens (about 176,900 words) per response; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) up to 236K (about 176,900 words).
When were Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) released?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B was listed on 2026-04-03; XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) on 2026-10-16.
Has the price of Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B or XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free) changed?
Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B: input price cut 12% ($0.08 → $0.07/1M), output price cut 12% ($0.26 → $0.23/1M) on 2026-10-17 (11 price changes since 2026-08-06). XingChen: Xing4.0 29B A4B (free): price unchanged since we started tracking it on 2026-10-17.
Gemma 4 26B A4B IT is an instruction-tuned Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) model from Google DeepMind. Despite 25.2B total parameters, only 3.8B activate per token during inference — delivering near-31B quality at...
Xing4.0-29B-A4B is an open-weight mixture-of-experts language model from China Telecom's AI team (TeleAI) and the successor to the TeleChat series. It has 29B total parameters with 4B active per token...