Auto-generated comparison

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Tencent: Hy3

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

Side-by-side comparison

CapabilityGoogle: Gemma 4 26B A4BTencent: Hy3Winner
Context window
Maximum number of input tokens the model can attend to in a single request.
262K262KTie
Input price (per 1M)
Cost per million input tokens billed by the provider.
$0.07$0.13🏆 Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Output price (per 1M)
Cost per million output tokens billed by the provider.
$0.34$0.53🏆 Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Tool / function calling
First-class support for emitting structured tool calls.
YesYesTie
Vision input
Accepts image inputs alongside text.
Yes🏆 Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B
Reasoning mode
Internal chain-of-thought / extended-thinking support.
YesYesTie

Frequently asked questions

Is Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Tencent: Hy3?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B wins on 3 of 6 axes — pricing and capability skew in its favour for most workloads.

What's the price difference between Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Tencent: Hy3?

Input: $0.07 vs $0.13 per 1M tokens. Output: $0.34 vs $0.53 per 1M tokens.

What context windows do Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Tencent: Hy3 support?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B supports up to 262K tokens. Tencent: Hy3 supports up to 262K tokens.

Do both Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B and Tencent: Hy3 support tool calling?

Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B: yes. Tencent: Hy3: yes.

Compare Google: Gemma 4 26B A4B with other models

Compare Tencent: Hy3 with other models