Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs gpt-oss-20b
gpt-oss-20b is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.02 against $0.02 per 1M tokens), though Gemma 4 26B A4B is cheaper on output. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window (262K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $17.37 a month for Gemma 4 26B A4B and $16.20 for gpt-oss-20b.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Gemma 4 26B A4B vs gpt-oss-20b”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it/vs/openai/gpt-oss-20b
Model A
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDB4
$0.02
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Gemma 4 26B A4B gpt-oss-20b · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. gpt-oss-20b (B3) sits 1 context band smaller than Gemma 4 26B A4B (B4).
Same square as Gemma 4 26B A4B: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ($0.06), Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ($0.09), Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct ($0.09). Same square as gpt-oss-20b: Mistral Nemo ($0.03), Gemma 3 12B ($0.05), Gemma 3 4B ($0.05). Open B4 · Open B3
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB3 | <$0.10 | 128–256K | gpt-oss-20b, Mistral Nemo, Gemma 3 12B, Gemma 3 4B, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, Mistral Small 3.2 24B |
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Gemma 4 26B A4B, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.7 Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.07 per 1M output against $0.09
- your prompts are long: it takes 262,144 tokens against 131,072
- you want to try it free: it lists a free tier
Choose gpt-oss-20b if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.02 per 1M input against $0.02
- work can wait: it lists a batch tier and the other does not
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than gpt-oss-20b?
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or gpt-oss-20b?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
Is either model free?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Gemma 4 26B A4B
By Google. $0.02 input and $0.07 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: free, standard.
Full specs & pricing →gpt-oss-20b
By OpenAI. $0.02 input and $0.09 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square B3. Tiers listed: standard, batch.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with…
Compare gpt-oss-20b with…
- Mistral Nemo$0.03
- Gemma 3 12B$0.05
- Gemma 3 4B$0.05
- Llama 3.1 8B Instruct$0.05
- All alternatives →
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than gpt-oss-20b?
- Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or gpt-oss-20b?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?