Model comparison · Updated 2 Nov 2026
Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Nemo
Gemma 4 26B A4B is about 1.2× cheaper on input ($0.02 against $0.03 per 1M tokens), though Mistral Nemo is cheaper on output. Gemma 4 26B A4B has the larger context window (262K against 131K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $17.37 a month for Gemma 4 26B A4B and $15.75 for Mistral Nemo.
Cite
Cite this page
ModelsAtlas. “Gemma 4 26B A4B vs Mistral Nemo”. Retrieved 2 Nov 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/google/gemma-4-26b-a4b-it/vs/mistralai/mistral-nemo
Model A
by Google · weights not marked open · GRIDB4
$0.02
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 2 Nov 2026
Model B
by Mistral AI · weights not marked open · GRIDB3
$0.03
- Source
- Our catalogue
- Retrieved
- 10 Oct 2026
Key numbers
Standard tier · highlighted = better
What it costs for real workloads
Monthly, standard tier, 30 days
Gemma 4 26B A4B Mistral Nemo · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.
On the atlas
Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)
1 square apart. Mistral Nemo (B3) sits 1 context band smaller than Gemma 4 26B A4B (B4).
Same square as Gemma 4 26B A4B: Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B ($0.06), Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507 ($0.09), Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct ($0.09). Same square as Mistral Nemo: gpt-oss-20b ($0.02), Gemma 3 12B ($0.05), Gemma 3 4B ($0.05). Open B4 · Open B3
View the map as a table (3 squares)
| Square | Price band | Context band | Models |
|---|---|---|---|
| GRIDB3 | <$0.10 | 128–256K | Mistral Nemo, gpt-oss-20b, Gemma 3 12B, Gemma 3 4B, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct, Mistral Small 3.2 24B |
| GRIDB4 | <$0.10 | 256K–1M | Gemma 4 26B A4B, Nemotron 3 Nano 30B A3B, Qwen3 235B A22B Instruct 2507, Qwen3 Next 80B A3B Instruct |
| GRIDB5 | <$0.10 | 1M | Qwen3.7 Flash |
Capabilities side by side
Only what our records list
Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.
Which should you choose?
EditorialChoose Gemma 4 26B A4B if…
- you pay by the token: it costs $0.02 per 1M input against $0.03
- your prompts are long: it takes 262,144 tokens against 131,072
- you want to try it free: it lists a free tier
Choose Mistral Nemo if…
- output dominates your bill: $0.03 per 1M output against $0.07
Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.
Questions
Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Mistral Nemo?
Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Nemo?
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
Which has the larger context window?
Do both offer batch pricing?
Can both read images or audio?
Is either model open-weight?
Is either model free?
What would each cost for a support chatbot?
About the two models
Gemma 4 26B A4B
By Google. $0.02 input and $0.07 output per 1M tokens, 262K context, atlas square B4. Tiers listed: free, standard.
Full specs & pricing →Mistral Nemo
By Mistral AI. $0.03 input and $0.03 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square B3. Tiers listed: standard.
Full specs & pricing →Compare Gemma 4 26B A4B with…
Compare Mistral Nemo with…
Keep going in your AI
Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.
- Is Gemma 4 26B A4B better than Mistral Nemo?
- Which is cheaper, Gemma 4 26B A4B or Mistral Nemo?
- How much does each cost per 1M tokens?