Model comparison · Updated 10 Oct 2026

Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mistral Nemo

Q: Is Command R7B (12-2024) better than Mistral Nemo?

We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Mistral Nemo is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.04 per 1M tokens) and on output. Mistral Nemo has the larger context window (131K against 128K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $30.38 a month for Command R7B (12-2024) and $15.75 for Mistral Nemo. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.

Q: Which is cheaper, Command R7B (12-2024) or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo: $0.03 against $0.04 per 1M input tokens, and $0.03 against $0.15 per 1M output, on standard pricing.

Q: How much does each cost per 1M tokens?

Command R7B (12-2024): $0.04 input and $0.15 output. Mistral Nemo: $0.03 input and $0.03 output. Standard tier, USD.

Q: Which has the larger context window?

Mistral Nemo, with 131,072 tokens. Command R7B (12-2024) has 128,000 tokens.

Q: Do both offer batch pricing?

Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.

Q: Can both read images or audio?

Input types recorded for Command R7B (12-2024): none recorded. For Mistral Nemo: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.

Q: Is either model open-weight?

Command R7B (12-2024): not marked open-weight in our records. Mistral Nemo: not marked open-weight in our records.

Q: What would each cost for a support chatbot?

At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $30.38 a month for Command R7B (12-2024) and $15.75 for Mistral Nemo. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

Mistral Nemo is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.04 per 1M tokens) and on output. Mistral Nemo has the larger context window (131K against 128K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $30.38 a month for Command R7B (12-2024) and $15.75 for Mistral Nemo.

Ask an AI about this pageGChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity GeGemini XGrok

CoCopilot AIGoogle AI Mode

Cite

Cite this page

ModelsAtlas. “Command R7B (12-2024) vs Mistral Nemo”. Retrieved 10 Oct 2026. https://modelsatlas.com/compare/cohere/command-r7b-12/vs/mistralai/mistral-nemo

Model A

Command R7B (12-2024)

by Cohere · weights not marked open · GRIDB2

Input / 1M
$0.04
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
17 Aug 2026

Output / 1M$0.15

Context128K

Model B

Mistral Nemo

by Mistral AI · weights not marked open · GRIDB3

Input / 1M
$0.03
observed We measured
Source
Our catalogue
Retrieved
10 Oct 2026

Output / 1M$0.03

Context131K

Key numbers

Standard tier · highlighted = better

Command R7B (12-2024)

Mistral Nemo

Input / 1M tokens

$0.04

$0.03

Output / 1M tokens

$0.15

$0.03

Batch input / output

Not listed

Context window

128,000

131,072

Input types

Not disclosed

Weights

Not marked open

Tiers listed

standard

Prices checked

2026-08-17

2026-10-10

What it costs for real workloads

Monthly, standard tier, 30 days

Support chatbot10k chats/day · 1.5k in, 300 out

$30.38/mo

$15.75/mo

RAG over documents2k queries/day · 12k in, 500 out

$31.50/mo

$21.78/mo

Coding agent300 tasks/day · 60k in, 8k out

$31.05/mo

$17.82/mo

Command R7B (12-2024) Mistral Nemo · Derived from the standard-tier prices above, input and output tokens per request as stated, 30 days. Excludes caching discounts and batch. Try your own numbers.

On the atlas

Price band (A–H) × context band (1–6)

1 square apart. Mistral Nemo (B3) sits 1 context band larger than Command R7B (12-2024) (B2).

Same square as Command R7B (12-2024): Llama 3.2 1B Instruct ($0.03), Mistral Small 3 ($0.05). Same square as Mistral Nemo: gpt-oss-20b ($0.02), gpt-oss-120b ($0.03), Gemma 3 12B ($0.05). Open B2 · Open B3

Command R7B (12-2024)Mistral NemoNearest neighboursOpen weights

View the map as a table (2 squares)

Square	Price band	Context band	Models
GRIDB2	<$0.10	32–128K	Command R7B (12-2024), Mistral Small 3, Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
GRIDB3	<$0.10	128–256K	Mistral Nemo, gpt-oss-120b, Gemma 3 12B, Gemma 3 4B, gpt-oss-20b, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Llama 3.2 3B Instruct

Capabilities side by side

Only what our records list

Command R7B (12-2024)

Mistral Nemo

Vision input

Not disclosed

Audio input

Not disclosed

Open weights

Not marked open

Batch tier

Not listed

Free tier

Not listed

Thinking tier

Not listed

Neither record lists input types, so we do not claim any.

Which should you choose?

Editorial

Choose Command R7B (12-2024) if…

Nothing in the recorded numbers favours Command R7B (12-2024) over Mistral Nemo. Pick it for what our records do not cover — your own tests, or an account you already have with Cohere.

Choose Mistral Nemo if…

you pay by the token: it costs $0.03 per 1M input against $0.04
output dominates your bill: $0.03 per 1M output against $0.15
your prompts are long: it takes 131,072 tokens against 128,000

Each reason is a fact from the tables above. Picking between them is our judgement, and we do not benchmark quality: price and context are what we can measure, so test both on your own prompts before you commit.

Questions

Is Command R7B (12-2024) better than Mistral Nemo?

We do not benchmark quality, so we cannot say. On the recorded numbers: Mistral Nemo is about 1.3× cheaper on input ($0.03 against $0.04 per 1M tokens) and on output. Mistral Nemo has the larger context window (131K against 128K tokens). For a support chatbot at 10,000 chats a day, the standard-tier bill is about $30.38 a month for Command R7B (12-2024) and $15.75 for Mistral Nemo. Which is better for you depends on your task; test both on your own prompts.

Which is cheaper, Command R7B (12-2024) or Mistral Nemo?

Mistral Nemo: $0.03 against $0.04 per 1M input tokens, and $0.03 against $0.15 per 1M output, on standard pricing.

How much does each cost per 1M tokens?

Command R7B (12-2024): $0.04 input and $0.15 output. Mistral Nemo: $0.03 input and $0.03 output. Standard tier, USD.

Which has the larger context window?

Mistral Nemo, with 131,072 tokens. Command R7B (12-2024) has 128,000 tokens.

Do both offer batch pricing?

Neither lists a batch tier in our catalogue.

Can both read images or audio?

Input types recorded for Command R7B (12-2024): none recorded. For Mistral Nemo: none recorded. Where a record lists none we say so rather than guess; check each vendor's documentation before relying on a capability.

Is either model open-weight?

Command R7B (12-2024): not marked open-weight in our records. Mistral Nemo: not marked open-weight in our records.

What would each cost for a support chatbot?

At 10,000 chats a day, 1,500 input and 300 output tokens each, 30 days, standard tier: about $30.38 a month for Command R7B (12-2024) and $15.75 for Mistral Nemo. This is our calculation from the listed prices, not a quote.

About the two models

Command R7B (12-2024)

By Cohere. $0.04 input and $0.15 output per 1M tokens, 128K context, atlas square B2. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Mistral Nemo

By Mistral AI. $0.03 input and $0.03 output per 1M tokens, 131K context, atlas square B3. Tiers listed: standard.

Full specs & pricing →

Compare Command R7B (12-2024) with…

Compare Mistral Nemo with…

Keep going in your AI

Opens with this page as the source. We add nothing else to the prompt.

Is Command R7B (12-2024) better than Mistral Nemo?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity
Which is cheaper, Command R7B (12-2024) or Mistral Nemo?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity
How much does each cost per 1M tokens?
GChatGPT CClaude PPerplexity